| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Copy and paste this link | |
| Posted by: | John Cameron | |
| Date/Time: | 10/05/18 14:02:00 |
| I think the Muir v WBC case is more relevant to the WPCC allowing private (for profit) nurseries exclusive use of the common. I believe there are now three operating on the commons, and commercial summer campus taking bookings for the schooll holidays. This follows Lee strategy to commercialise the commons as he see business opportunities everywhere. The Little Creatures (I don’t think that their name) intensive use damages the natural aspect and leaves it in a poorer state than if they were not there. Thier use of the site is exclusive. Lee never discussed the commercial nurseries with the board, it was never mentioned to the trustees who now carry the responsibility for it. The Spencer benches to create “Putney’s biggest beer garden: are unlawful under the 1871 Act on multiple points. I met with Diane Neil Mills on Tuesday to engage with the WPCC. I had hoped that by doing so we could avoid the misconduct by the trustees escalating. I am waiting to hear from DNM with some concrete proposals etc. |