| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Objection to Benches | |
| Posted by: | John Cameron | |
| Date/Time: | 06/04/18 12:36:00 |
| @ John You can stick up for the Conservators and anyone else you care to. Just as I am prepared to expose the WPCC’s deceit and duplicity when they push through their deals and ignore the law and then lie about it. Do you think it is acceptable for Wandsworth’s planning department to deliberately lie, simply to push through their employers planning permission. The 1871 Act could not be clearer, the common is to be kept as common, and not turned into a commercial beer garden. Residents cannot simply choose to interpret bits they like or ignore the Act, it is LAW. You don’t have to a lawyer, or even particularly intelligent to grasp and understand what the Act says. It is written in very plain and easily understood English. The trustees, by creating an agreement for five years, are alienating part of the common. They are entering into an exclusive agreement with the Spencer to place benches on it. Alienation, which the trustees are legally obliged to prevent, and as they are doing it wilfully it is misconduct. Do you think that is was acceptable that the first application contained deliberate lies in order to push it through the process? Lies which caused the application to be pulled when they were exposed, lies that were supported by the Conservators, although they were well aware of them? |