Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Not the Conservators' Q&A | |
Posted by: | Jonty Nicholls | |
Date/Time: | 28/09/14 18:51:00 |
It is indeed very difficult to follow. I thought I had finally understood how many golf courses are on the common, but then the other day that bloke Pike made out there were 3. So I remain confused about that one. So whereabouts in the judgement did the judges say there was no right of way? I hadn't appreciated they had even been asked to give a ruling on this issue. On the final point, your position is entirely normative. The 1871 act provides that roads may be built when Conservators feel it is right and proper. And the Conservators of the day, duly elected, deemed it was right and proper for that road to be built. Nothing illegal, nothing fast and loose, nothing "got away with". However, you disagree with them. So quite right if as a result you and anyone else chooses to vote for someone else next time round, or even to stand yourself. To try to leave the impression though that this particular road is illegal is a tad disingenuous. |