| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Not the Conservators' Q&A | |
| Posted by: | John Cameron | |
| Date/Time: | 28/09/14 12:53:00 |
| @ Caroline W The Act says the Conservators can build roads on the Common. So the Conservator entered into a legal agreement to allow Wandsworth to build roads on the Common. Not the Conservators, Wandsworth. Realising that this was legally exposed the Conservators, in the middle of the court hearings changed the agreement to appoint Wandsworth to build roads, on behalf of the Conservators. The roads of course are not for the Conservators, they are for Wandsworth. They changed the agreement at the suggestion of Wandsworth, whose lawyers realised that the weakness of the as then signed agreement. This alone exposes the lengths that the Conservators, appointed to protect the Commons from encroachment would go to, to help out their mates. No consultation, no debate, just roll over and kick your legs in the air. They allowed the RWGC to build a car park on the common, a super dooper landscaped, secured car park, with a gate and signs that say private. Not a car park for the visitors to the common. Park your car in it, or wander in and have a picnic with your mates. Devons says it's temporary and common. It's not temporary and its not common. Devons is lying, it's the Royal Wimbledon Golf Club's car park, And the road at Putney Common is Wandsworths. Built by Wandsworth, funded by Wandsworth, to a school owned by Wandsworth, a block of luxury flats owned by Wandsworth, and all maintained and managed by Wandsworth going forward. Not the Conservators, Wandsworth. The Conservators and Wandsworth, acting as one. **** the levy payers who own the common, look after your mates |