| Topic: | Re:Case officers' reports. | |
| Posted by: | John Cameron | |
| Date/Time: | 07/12/12 07:55:00 |
| The good news thought that in this case the planning officers are going to have to explain "....there is no evidence of bats, badger or reptile activity on the site..." when they had clear written evidence in the form of specialist habitat reports to the contrary. The explanation will be to a High Court Judge, when WBC defend their unlawful decision that an EIA wasn't required Date of the hearing tbc, so keep your diaries free for 2013 |