Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Reply
Posted by: John Hawkes
Date/Time: 11/03/26 12:28:00

Mr Ainsworth

'Iran would have to be utterly mad (madder than Trump even) to actually to obtain and prepare to use them.'

But 'it' or the mullahs that rule in Iran are mad.

They are extreme Islamists whose aim is to dominate the region and to annihilate Israel.

Not that either point would concern you.

'Face it, Israel does not want Iran to gain the power to counterbalance the power of Israel. Israel wishes to retain superiority. They know that the US may not be there always as back-up power'.

Israel wishes to retain superiority in what regard ?

Not economically or politically in a region of failed Islamic states.

It holds this position already.

But certainly it wishes quite rightly to retain it militarily  as protection against states that wish to see it annihilated as we all know you do to.

And against the misogynistic Islamic religion of states that surround it which place more emphasis on martyrdom and a glorious sexual afterlife than it does with peace and harmony in this one.

Stop supporting and encouraging them.

Pity you could not join the Al Quds Day march scheduled for London on Sunday, now banned by the fascist Labour Government.

Could you tell us what they are protesting for or against ?

Or are you going to persist in joining one and run the risk of arrest ?

'This morning, a spokesperson for the Islamic Human Rights (sic) Commission (IHRC), which organises the protest, confirmed a static demonstration will still happen.

They said: 'IHRC strongly condemns the decision by the Metropolitan Police to ban the Al Quds Day March. However, a static Al Quds Day protest will still go ahead.

'We hope to see you on Sunday 15th March Insha Allah. All preparations must continue as planned. We are seeking legal advice and this decision will not go unchallenged.'

The statement added: 'If it was not clear already, the police have brazenly abandoned their sworn principle of policing without fear or favour, and have capitulated to the pressure of the Zionist lobby (Ah pesky Jews controlling the Government and the Met Police).

'The Metropolitan Police unashamedly regurgitate Zionist talking points about IHRC without a shred of evidence. They cannot present evidence because there is none – we are an independent NGO.' (With what objective one wonders) 

'A spokesman for the IHRC, Faisal Bodi, told the BBC's The World Tonight that it was 'a sad day for freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and the right of people to legitimately protest about issues they feel strongly about'.

He added: 'This demonstration has taken place for the last 40 years peacefully.'

Note that the Al-Quds Brigades is the military wing of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and is the second-largest armed group in the Gaza Strip, known for its paramilitary operations against Israel.

The IHRC has previously expressed support for Iran's former supreme leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Following his death in a US-Israeli airstrike last month, the group said Mr Khamenei 'chose to stand on the right side of history' and described him as 'a rare role model' who would be 'mourned by freedom loving people all over the world'.

Well almost - strongly backed by Iran's terror police in reality.

Why don't these Arabs leave the UK and fight their tribal religious wars on their own turf ?

Why does the British taxpayer have to support their vile and malign actions on our streets ?


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 20:45:00 Jonathan Callaway
   Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 21:25:00 Steven Rose
      Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 21:29:00 Jonathan Callaway
         Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 23:09:00 Steven Rose
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture06/03/26 08:16:00 Michael Brigo
               Reply06/03/26 09:09:00 Richard Carter
                  Re:Reply06/03/26 09:52:00 Steven Rose
                     Re:Re:Reply06/03/26 11:02:00 Jonathan Callaway
                     Re:Re:Reply07/03/26 13:53:00 David Ainsworth
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply07/03/26 23:07:00 Steven Rose
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply07/03/26 23:59:00 David Ainsworth
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply08/03/26 01:09:00 Steven Rose
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply08/03/26 10:49:00 Jonathan Callaway
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 13:45:00 Steven Rose
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 14:26:00 David Ainsworth
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 15:07:00 Steven Rose
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 15:25:00 David Ainsworth
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 17:05:00 Jonathan Callaway
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 21:45:00 Steven Rose
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 23:08:00 David Ainsworth
                                          Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl09/03/26 00:38:00 Steven Rose
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl09/03/26 09:08:00 David Ainsworth
   Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 09:16:00 Gerry Boyce
      Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 13:23:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 13:35:00 Gerry Boyce
            Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 14:14:00 John Hawkes
               Re:Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 14:40:00 Gerry Boyce
                  Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 17:43:00 Jonathan Callaway
                     Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 21:48:00 Steven Rose
                        Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 22:07:00 Robert Wheeler
                        Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 13:27:00 Jonathan Callaway
                           "Imminent" for 30 years10/03/26 13:47:00 David Ainsworth
                  Re:Re:Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 17:35:00 John Hawkes
                     Re:Re:Re:Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 18:35:00 Gerry Boyce
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 16:59:00 John Hawkes
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 17:35:00 Steven Rose
                  Reply10/03/26 18:44:00 Michael Ixer
                     Re:Reply10/03/26 21:50:00 Steven Rose
                        Reply10/03/26 22:34:00 Michael Ixer
                           Re:Reply10/03/26 22:53:00 Steven Rose
                              Re:Re:Reply10/03/26 23:13:00 Steven Rose
                                 Re:Re:Re:Reply10/03/26 23:25:00 David Ainsworth
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 11:47:00 John Hawkes
                                 Reply11/03/26 22:12:00 Michael Ixer
                                    Re:Reply12/03/26 18:24:00 John Hawkes
                                       Reply12/03/26 19:41:00 Michael Ixer
                        Re:Re:Reply10/03/26 23:38:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 00:29:00 Steven Rose
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 00:59:00 David Ainsworth
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 09:28:00 Steven Rose
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 09:46:00 David Ainsworth
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 09:58:00 Steven Rose
                                          Israel operates with almost complete lack of international oversight11/03/26 10:09:00 David Ainsworth
                                             Reply11/03/26 10:43:00 Robert Wheeler
                                             Re:Israel operates with almost complete lack of international oversight11/03/26 13:25:00 John Hawkes
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 12:40:00 John Hawkes
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 12:28:00 John Hawkes

Forum Home