Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply
Posted by: David Ainsworth
Date/Time: 11/03/26 09:46:00

That's the way to do it.

"Iran has enriched uranium to a level far beyond anything that might be needed for peaceful purposes with the clear intention of building a nuclear bomb."

"In March 2025, the US Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Tulsi Gabbard, testified that the US intelligence community continued to assess that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon.

Key details from the 2025 assessment and subsequent events include:
Initial 2025 Assessment: During testimony for the Annual Threat Assessment on 25 March 2025, DNI Gabbard stated that despite high levels of uranium enrichment, Iran had not restarted the nuclear weapons program it suspended in 2003 and that Supreme Leader Khamenei had not reauthorized such a program.
Contradiction by President Trump: In June 2025, President Donald Trump publicly disagreed with this assessment, stating that the intelligence community was "wrong" and claiming that Iran was actually "very close to having a weapon".
Subsequent Clarification: Following the President's public criticism, Gabbard clarified her position in late June 2025, stating that her March testimony had been "taken out of context" and that Iran could now produce a nuclear weapon "within weeks to months".
Military Action: These conflicting assessments occurred shortly before the US and Israel launched targeted strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025, which the administration claimed "obliterated" key capabilities."

Facts are immutable, aren't they?

30 years of imminence, remember? Finally Netanyahu found a willing sucker in Trump.

.........................
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.

Groucho Marx


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 20:45:00 Jonathan Callaway
   Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 21:25:00 Steven Rose
      Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 21:29:00 Jonathan Callaway
         Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture05/03/26 23:09:00 Steven Rose
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture06/03/26 08:16:00 Michael Brigo
               Reply06/03/26 09:09:00 Richard Carter
                  Re:Reply06/03/26 09:52:00 Steven Rose
                     Re:Re:Reply06/03/26 11:02:00 Jonathan Callaway
                     Re:Re:Reply07/03/26 13:53:00 David Ainsworth
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply07/03/26 23:07:00 Steven Rose
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply07/03/26 23:59:00 David Ainsworth
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply08/03/26 01:09:00 Steven Rose
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply08/03/26 10:49:00 Jonathan Callaway
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 13:45:00 Steven Rose
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 14:26:00 David Ainsworth
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 15:07:00 Steven Rose
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 15:25:00 David Ainsworth
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 17:05:00 Jonathan Callaway
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 21:45:00 Steven Rose
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl08/03/26 23:08:00 David Ainsworth
                                          Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl09/03/26 00:38:00 Steven Rose
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Repl09/03/26 09:08:00 David Ainsworth
   Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 09:16:00 Gerry Boyce
      Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 13:23:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 13:35:00 Gerry Boyce
            Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 14:14:00 John Hawkes
               Re:Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 14:40:00 Gerry Boyce
                  Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 17:43:00 Jonathan Callaway
                     Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 21:48:00 Steven Rose
                        Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture09/03/26 22:07:00 Robert Wheeler
                        Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 13:27:00 Jonathan Callaway
                           "Imminent" for 30 years10/03/26 13:47:00 David Ainsworth
                  Re:Re:Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 17:35:00 John Hawkes
                     Re:Re:Re:Was Gerry Adams in the IRA ?Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 18:35:00 Gerry Boyce
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 16:59:00 John Hawkes
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Philippe Sands on International Law -  a very relevant lecture10/03/26 17:35:00 Steven Rose
                  Reply10/03/26 18:44:00 Michael Ixer
                     Re:Reply10/03/26 21:50:00 Steven Rose
                        Reply10/03/26 22:34:00 Michael Ixer
                           Re:Reply10/03/26 22:53:00 Steven Rose
                              Re:Re:Reply10/03/26 23:13:00 Steven Rose
                                 Re:Re:Re:Reply10/03/26 23:25:00 David Ainsworth
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 11:47:00 John Hawkes
                                 Reply11/03/26 22:12:00 Michael Ixer
                                    Re:Reply12/03/26 18:24:00 John Hawkes
                                       Reply12/03/26 19:41:00 Michael Ixer
                        Re:Re:Reply10/03/26 23:38:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 00:29:00 Steven Rose
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 00:59:00 David Ainsworth
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 09:28:00 Steven Rose
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 09:46:00 David Ainsworth
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 09:58:00 Steven Rose
                                          Israel operates with almost complete lack of international oversight11/03/26 10:09:00 David Ainsworth
                                             Reply11/03/26 10:43:00 Robert Wheeler
                                             Re:Israel operates with almost complete lack of international oversight11/03/26 13:25:00 John Hawkes
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 12:40:00 John Hawkes
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply11/03/26 12:28:00 John Hawkes

Forum Home