Topic: | Re:Re:Reply | |
Posted by: | Ed Robinson | |
Date/Time: | 03/03/24 23:23:00 |
I'm not sure what percentage of leaseholds have sink funds and if they do how sufficient those funds are. Some quote 60% of leaseholds. Many council privatised properties do not have a sink fund. Wandsworth properties do not as far as I'm aware. With small or low rise properties maintenance costs are fairly easy to determine although still not without difficulty. However with larger properties the costs seem to spiral with many having been originally sold at very low prices compared to future maintenance costs. For example a low rise flat may have originally been sold in the early 80,s for 30K. Five years later it needs a new roof that will then cost 10K. If the people were lucky they would have sold on the flat during the boom that saw property prices double. However many leaseholders are not so lucky. Of course ignoring the 17% interest rates - a couple of decades later and that property is now worth 250k but only if they sell it. In the meantime they have retired and another roof replacement is now due not to mention the other numerous mayor repairs in between. Some of the high rises the prices are more extreme and many less able to afford those high costs. Together with some buy to let landlords this partly explains the resistance that is encountered when doing some improvements that make economic sense in the long term such as replacing single with double glazing. I should say that I bought my flat privately at the hight of the late 80's boom and subsequent 17% interest rates but still considered myself fortunate compared with younger people trying to buy a property. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Leasehold & Freehold (Reform) Bill | 27/02/24 18:41:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Leasehold & Freehold (Reform) Bill | 27/02/24 19:04:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Reply | 27/02/24 21:31:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 27/02/24 21:38:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Reply | 28/02/24 01:45:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 05:31:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Reply | 28/02/24 08:14:00 | Andy Pike |
Reply | 28/02/24 09:13:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 09:32:00 | Andy Pike |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 09:21:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Re:Re:Reply | 28/02/24 09:40:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Reply | 28/02/24 10:24:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 10:45:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Reply | 28/02/24 10:31:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 10:40:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Re:Re:Reply | 28/02/24 10:49:00 | Andy Pike |
Reply | 28/02/24 11:01:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 11:15:00 | Andy Pike |
Reply | 28/02/24 12:01:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 13:20:00 | Andy Pike |
Reply | 28/02/24 14:00:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Re:Re:Reply | 28/02/24 15:32:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Reply | 28/02/24 11:23:00 | Michael Ixer |
Reply | 28/02/24 13:45:00 | Martine Guy |
Reply | 28/02/24 13:51:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 15:37:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Re:Re:Reply | 28/02/24 16:18:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 28/02/24 15:30:00 | Barbara Stevens |
Re:Re:Reply | 01/03/24 13:56:00 | Lucille Grant |
Reply | 01/03/24 15:08:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 01/03/24 15:23:00 | Philippa Bond |
Reply | 01/03/24 16:03:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 01/03/24 19:39:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Reply | 03/03/24 07:51:00 | Philippa Bond |
Reply | 03/03/24 20:09:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 03/03/24 22:29:00 | Philippa Bond |
Reply | 03/03/24 22:48:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 29/03/24 15:13:00 | Philippa Bond |
Re:Re:Reply | 03/03/24 23:23:00 | Ed Robinson |
Reply | 24/03/24 11:53:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 24/03/24 14:10:00 | Lucille Grant |
Reply | 24/03/24 14:39:00 | Martine Guy |
Reply | 27/03/24 15:20:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 27/03/24 16:54:00 | Andy Pike |
Reply | 27/03/24 20:47:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 30/03/24 12:27:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Re:Reply | 29/03/24 21:14:00 | Elizabeth Balsom |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 31/03/24 23:09:00 | Philippa Bond |