| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Should Begum Be Allowed Back? | |
| Posted by: | Fraser Pearce | |
| Date/Time: | 18/02/19 10:36:00 |
| Jihadi brides perhaps aren’t the immediate problem. There are the returning jihadi fighters… …Then there’s Western Europe facing a large proportion of convicted terrorists soon hitting the streets again. This after serving time among a radicalised, Islamist cohort in European prisons – itself leaving additional prisoners at risk of being radicalized (one country in Europe recently lost over 70% of its prison imams after learning they were in the pay of a foreign, Islamist regime). …Point being, short-to-medium term we face returning jihadis and large numbers of convicted terrorists being back on European streets. --- Long term, the jihadi brides become a problem. Demographic domination is part of Islamist ideology, outbreeding the host population a soft stratagem of war (the Islamic calendar’s based on the Muslim emigration from Mecca to Medina and eventual domination). Islamism preaches the long game, that demographics really are your destiny. They expect to dominate, not integrate. When back here, it’s highly probable Begum will become a baby factory. Even the benefits she’ll receive can be rationalised away as jizya, the tax on unbelievers. You owe her a living. These people don’t think like us. Their actions can be explained by religious principle, custom, culture and history the majority British population remain deeply ignorant of. --- The people of Syria didn’t deserve supremacist, jihadi colonialists to descend on them from all over the world. Then again, neither did we. This young lady was radicalized in Bethnal Green, not Syria. |