| Topic: | Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | |
| Posted by: | James Milnes | |
| Date/Time: | 06/10/09 17:12:00 |
| Whilst I take your point Suzanne, the reason I use that crossing as opposed to the others suggested is that it's the most direct route for me. And given that it is designated as a crossing point why shouldn't I? It's either meant to be used as a crossing or it isn't. And if it is then what I'm asking is why can't more protection be given to those using it? |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Crossing Putney Hill | 06/10/09 15:10:00 | James Milnes |
| Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 06/10/09 16:51:00 | Suzanne Taylor |
| Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 06/10/09 16:51:00 | John Horrocks |
| Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 06/10/09 17:12:00 | James Milnes |
| Re:Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 06/10/09 17:55:00 | Suzanne Taylor |
| Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 10/02/10 13:14:00 | James Milnes |
| Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 10/02/10 13:19:00 | Jean Gilmore |
| Re:Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 10/02/10 21:21:00 | Leslie McDonnell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 11/02/10 12:53:00 | Richard Jennings |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 11/02/10 13:07:00 | James Milnes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 11/02/10 16:00:00 | Alan Sherman |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 12/02/10 15:48:00 | M Blissett |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Crossing Putney Hill | 12/02/10 22:46:00 | James Dixon |