Doesn't Tice try and promote himself as a professional businessman and in whose hands the country's finances would be better managed? So, surely, he should have a better grasp of his tax affairs. Rayner has had to struggle to get to her position from a background where trusts were never encountered so there's more excuse for her to misunderstand or not query advice given to her? Of course, we're probably not close enough to the details to judge accurately in either case, and one might take the view either would be suitable as PM - not that it's likely in Tice's case. |