Topic: | Re:Reply | |
Posted by: | Ed Robinson | |
Date/Time: | 22/07/23 19:57:00 |
Looking at Gove's response and trying not to fall asleep, it appears the decision was mainly based on preserving the heritage of the building. He acknowledges that the replacement was considered "BREEAM Outstanding" - which I think is mentioned in an FT article. Interesting he also notes about timing and the impact decarbonisation of the grid will have on construction and emissions. The problem is that environmental parameters will move as construction becomes greener and materials and techniques improve. "Ed, would the campaign have still taken place" That's not quite the question I asked. I was just wondering if some of the campaigners were support the environment or Britain’s heritage? And what happens when they conflict? https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1172463/23-07-20_DL_+_IR_456-472_OXFORD_STREET_LONDON_W1_-_3301508.pdf https://ongreening.com/breeam-rating-system-5-minute-guide/ |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
M&S Oxford Street building saved | 20/07/23 12:51:00 | Richard Carter |
Reply | 20/07/23 13:10:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 20/07/23 21:58:00 | Richard Carter |
Reply | 20/07/23 13:32:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 20/07/23 14:20:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved | 20/07/23 16:26:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved | 21/07/23 00:49:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved | 21/07/23 06:34:00 | Richard Carter |
Outside the box? | 21/07/23 14:25:00 | David Ainsworth |
Re:Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved | 21/07/23 20:36:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved | 21/07/23 20:41:00 | Ed Robinson |
Reply | 21/07/23 21:03:00 | Michael Ixer |
Re:Reply | 21/07/23 21:18:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Reply | 21/07/23 21:42:00 | David Ainsworth |
Re:Re:Re:Reply | 21/07/23 21:58:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 21/07/23 22:20:00 | David Ainsworth |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 22/07/23 08:52:00 | Ed Robinson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 22/07/23 16:45:00 | David Ainsworth |
Reply | 22/07/23 16:54:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 22/07/23 19:57:00 | Ed Robinson |
Reply | 22/07/23 20:31:00 | Martine Guy |
Reply | 22/07/23 21:03:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 24/07/23 15:42:00 | Philippa Bond |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved | 21/07/23 21:13:00 | David Ainsworth |
Reply | 22/07/23 10:27:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 22/07/23 23:02:00 | Ed Robinson |
Reply | 24/07/23 06:15:00 | Richard Carter |
Re:Reply | 24/07/23 09:20:00 | David Ainsworth |
Re:Re:Reply | 24/07/23 10:56:00 | Richard Carter |
Re:Reply | 24/07/23 17:36:00 | Ed Robinson |
Reply | 24/07/23 17:43:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 24/07/23 20:40:00 | Ed Robinson |
Reply | 27/07/23 16:12:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 01/09/23 10:15:00 | Richard Carter |
Reply | 01/09/23 10:31:00 | Martine Guy |
Reply | 21/11/23 15:31:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 24/11/23 20:06:00 | Philippa Bond |
Mmm& S wins on appeal | 01/03/24 20:31:00 | Richard Carter |
Reply | 01/03/24 20:43:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Reply | 02/03/24 09:23:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
Re: M&S wins on appeal | 01/03/24 22:51:00 | Richard Carter |