Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved
Posted by: Ed Robinson
Date/Time: 21/07/23 20:36:00

Good Old Richard selectively quoting.

What I find odd is that a new building would only use 25% less energy. That sounds incorrect or a shockingly low saving!

From your article:

"Campaigners argued the M&S project would have released 40,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The retailer had said its planned development would use 25% less energy than the existing site – benefits the designers Pilbrow + Partners argued would last a century – with a maximum carbon payback of 17 years and potentially less than 10.

That argument won over Westminster council’s planning authorities, while the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, opted not to intervene, considering the M&S application to be in line with the capital’s planning strategy."

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
M&S Oxford Street building saved20/07/23 12:51:00 Richard Carter
   Reply20/07/23 13:10:00 Martine Guy
      Re:Reply20/07/23 21:58:00 Richard Carter
   Reply20/07/23 13:32:00 Michael Ixer
      Re:Reply20/07/23 14:20:00 Caroline Whitehead
   Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved20/07/23 16:26:00 Ivonne Holliday
      Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved21/07/23 00:49:00 Ed Robinson
         Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved21/07/23 06:34:00 Richard Carter
            Outside the box?21/07/23 14:25:00 David Ainsworth
            Re:Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved21/07/23 20:36:00 Ed Robinson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved21/07/23 20:41:00 Ed Robinson
                  Reply21/07/23 21:03:00 Michael Ixer
                     Re:Reply21/07/23 21:18:00 Ed Robinson
                        Re:Re:Reply21/07/23 21:42:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply21/07/23 21:58:00 Ed Robinson
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply21/07/23 22:20:00 David Ainsworth
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply22/07/23 08:52:00 Ed Robinson
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply22/07/23 16:45:00 David Ainsworth
                                       Reply22/07/23 16:54:00 Martine Guy
                                          Re:Reply22/07/23 19:57:00 Ed Robinson
                                             Reply22/07/23 20:31:00 Martine Guy
                                 Reply22/07/23 21:03:00 Martine Guy
                                    Re:Reply24/07/23 15:42:00 Philippa Bond
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:M&S Oxford Street building saved21/07/23 21:13:00 David Ainsworth
                     Reply22/07/23 10:27:00 Martine Guy
                        Re:Reply22/07/23 23:02:00 Ed Robinson
                           Reply24/07/23 06:15:00 Richard Carter
                              Re:Reply24/07/23 09:20:00 David Ainsworth
                                 Re:Re:Reply24/07/23 10:56:00 Richard Carter
                              Re:Reply24/07/23 17:36:00 Ed Robinson
                                 Reply24/07/23 17:43:00 Martine Guy
                                    Re:Reply24/07/23 20:40:00 Ed Robinson
                                       Reply27/07/23 16:12:00 Martine Guy
                                          Re:Reply01/09/23 10:15:00 Richard Carter
                                             Reply01/09/23 10:31:00 Martine Guy
                                                Reply21/11/23 15:31:00 Martine Guy
                                                   Re:Reply24/11/23 20:06:00 Philippa Bond
                                                      Mmm& S wins on appeal01/03/24 20:31:00 Richard Carter
                                                         Reply01/03/24 20:43:00 Martine Guy
                                                            Re:Reply02/03/24 09:23:00 Ivonne Holliday
                                                         Re: M&S wins on appeal01/03/24 22:51:00 Richard Carter

Forum Home