| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | |
| Posted by: | Matt Palmer | |
| Date/Time: | 12/02/10 08:57:00 |
| bearing in mind the issues with pollution already which are apparently made worse by the close buildings down the high street.... i can't see the situation getting any better if even taller buildings are allowed. that said the superdrug and cinema blocks are eyesores imo |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 20:09:00 | Allan Manham |
| Re:Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 22:25:00 | Isabel Wooller |
| Re:Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 22:53:00 | Guy Sunda |
| Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 01:13:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 01:49:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 08:39:00 | Jim Maddan |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 09:34:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 21:09:00 | Alan Thomson |
| Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 08:57:00 | Matt Palmer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 16:56:00 | Guy Sunda |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 18/02/10 15:41:00 | Guy Sunda |