| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | |
| Posted by: | Jim Maddan | |
| Date/Time: | 12/02/10 08:39:00 |
| Patricia There was a clash with a meeting at the Town Hall that evening which is why no councillors were present. I have been copied in to number of representations made by local residents and I am fully aware of their views. It is worth remembering that there is a long way to go before the final proposals are implemented. April 2012 at the earliest. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 20:09:00 | Allan Manham |
| Re:Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 22:25:00 | Isabel Wooller |
| Re:Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 22:53:00 | Guy Sunda |
| Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 01:13:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 01:49:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 08:39:00 | Jim Maddan |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 09:34:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 21:09:00 | Alan Thomson |
| Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 08:57:00 | Matt Palmer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 16:56:00 | Guy Sunda |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 18/02/10 15:41:00 | Guy Sunda |