| Topic: | Re:Planning policy for URR? | |
| Posted by: | Guy Sunda | |
| Date/Time: | 11/02/10 22:53:00 |
| Nope not a ting missed ? After berating myself for mot turning up in person I thought SW.15 would save the day. I met a Putney Society member [Carol] at the library who'd attended the meeting [like wot u mentioned] And she [like myself] wondered why no one has made any reference to the plans for the three sites on Putney High st. In looking at the various sites on the URR from the document titled Area Spatial Strategy for Putney Town Centre South along with The Site Specific Allocations Document - Preffered Options. Well talk about a load of rubbish these doc's are unreal. We have indicative Building Boundaries inside areas marked as Suggested location for New Public Space [always a circle, half of which is within building boundaries] These New Public Space's completely exhonarate giving out planning permossion for the buildings with open spaces. Even tho all I saw was a few rectangles marking [much needed] New Buildings & Open Spaces are random circles 'most of which live inside building.' Now I'm reading The RTPI Planning Awards 2009 magazine.... Y'all have a god day |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 20:09:00 | Allan Manham |
| Re:Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 22:25:00 | Isabel Wooller |
| Re:Planning policy for URR? | 11/02/10 22:53:00 | Guy Sunda |
| Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 01:13:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 01:49:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 08:39:00 | Jim Maddan |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 09:34:00 | Patricia Poulter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 21:09:00 | Alan Thomson |
| Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 08:57:00 | Matt Palmer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 12/02/10 16:56:00 | Guy Sunda |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Planning policy for URR? | 18/02/10 15:41:00 | Guy Sunda |