Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again
Posted by: Jane Eades
Date/Time: 23/03/13 18:37:00

The "Boris" Island is, typically, headline grabbing but badly thought out.  It would be environmentally disastrous, but then, hey, we don't care about the wildlife, do we?

Clearly expanding north or south of the most densely populated area would be sensible.  However, overall, what we are seeing is the problem of privatising or outsourcing public services so that there is no linked up planning, just selfish competition.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Heathrow Third runway - again22/03/13 15:40:00 Lucille Grant
   Re:Heathrow Third runway - again22/03/13 16:41:00 Dave Roberts
      Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again22/03/13 18:26:00 Tim Henderson
         Re:Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again22/03/13 19:27:00 Roland Gilmore
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again22/03/13 23:08:00 Maggie Morris
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again22/03/13 23:56:00 Victoria Diamond
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again23/03/13 14:06:00 Dave Robertson
      Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again23/03/13 18:37:00 Jane Eades
         Re:Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again24/03/13 09:52:00 Roland Gilmore
   Aircraft noise thresholds24/03/13 08:59:00 Catherine Schade
      Re:Aircraft noise thresholds24/03/13 09:22:00 Lucille Grant
      Re:Aircraft noise thresholds25/03/13 11:03:00 Tim Henderson
   Re:Heathrow Third runway - again06/06/13 13:48:00 Tim Henderson
      Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again08/06/13 01:01:00 Bunny Payne
         Re:Re:Re:Heathrow Third runway - again08/06/13 22:05:00 Tim Henderson

Forum Home