David Devon’s hopes his “somewhat lengthy explanation has clarified matters”
It might have done, if DD had taken the time to address the shady deal rather than focussing on actions that are largely historical.
David’s glib summary.... that Putney Lower Common will be “larger”, two roads, the car park and current eyesore buildings will finally disappear, says it all.
David starts by saying that no land has been exchanged or sold to anyone as the 1871 Act prevent this. The Conservators agreed to WBC including 60% of the site that the invalid application covers, to be part of the application. Whereon will be constructed the entire road access, from the LRR to both the school and the flats, and at which point the roads will cease to be common land. By granting the legal rights the roads will effectively become part of the proposed school and flats, for the next 150 years. A sale of an easement, in return for a payment, is effectively the sale of land. The road system land has been sold; and in defiance of the 1871 Act, it will cease to be common land.
And if I am wrong on this point, I invite residents to try having a few breakfast time picnics on the road system, if and when the flats and school gets built. And see what happens.
David goes on to explain the history of access to the site and what happened between 2006 and 2010. All utterly irrelevant; any rights would assume that the planning use was the same and continuous. It is neither. The rights to access a house (or a hospital / nurses home) that were enjoyed do not extend legally to a new primary school and 24 flats. The rights would cease with the change of use, which is why WBC and WPCC had to do their shady deal. WBC had no access to the land. The Conservators totally controlled the Putney Hospital site, by virtue of owning all the land surrounding it. Any development needed their complete cooperation and consent for the site to be developed.
WPCC, a body elected by the public who fund their existence, negotiated and entered into their deal without any consultation whatsoever. The first anyone knew of it was when the deal was done. WPCC gave no consideration to the future of the common, whether the proposed use was appropriate, what impact there would be in terms of traffic, health, environment, aesthetic. Not to mention caring about local residents. WPCC agreed a deal, followed the money and then boasted what a great job they had done.
Well they could have done a bit better......they could have told WBC and WPCT to look at alternatives. WPCC could have insisted on a development that was appropriate, a scheme that enhanced and would be the long term benefit of the common. Not much to ask, I am sure there would have been lots of pretty decent suggestions. But maybe suggestions that didn’t suit WBC or WPCT who wasted millions on maintaining the security of an empty unwanted building for 15 years, as the income would go to the Treasury. Maybe a high end residential scheme, with beautiful architecture, landscaping, and a big fat payment in lieu of affordable housing. Probably worth £10m+ as a site, with planning. Of which WPCC could have demanded, and got £5m, or 20x the payment they may or may not receive. Or maybe a wonderfully designed scheme of affordable housing. Or both or neither. But instead they cooked up a scheme to keep the proceeds with WPCT and to promote a scheme that is totally and utterly inappropriate, that will bring chaos to the road system, fatalities and accidents involving children, an inadequately designed building that is not fit for purpose....on a site that is not fit for purpose.
So why did WPCC go down this route? Is it because they were leant on by WBC, threatened with a CPO or even winding up entirely, by WBC? Are they so wet that they were bullied into it? Apparently yes, it was confirmed to me by a Conservator. So they knuckled under, instead of telling WBC to shove it.
David tells us everything was fully reported in the Commons News, circulated once a year, after the event. WPCC also tell us that you can attend their monthly board meetings. I attended one in March, to listen to the debate about the Spencer Benches. At the meeting, Norman Plastow (a retiring Conservator of some 33 years service) spoke eloquently that he thought the benches were a mistake, and that the Conservators had got it wrong. Not a single word of this was reported in the March minutes, or of the other comments made by Conservators. Maybe I was at a different meeting.
WPCC need to start taking responsibility for the inadequacy of their actions. They have let down the commons and the residents, and behaved like a bunch of schoolboy amateurs. Their deal is shabby and shady; WPCC refused to release documents, WPCC refuse to confirm detail, WPCC refuse perfectly reasonable requests to explain their actions, WPCC redact information.
WPCC have a lot riding on the outcome of Putney Hospital, but ironically they could still turn it around. Their deal is subject to planning permission. And the application is invalid. If planning isn’t granted for the school, there will be an opportunity for a solution at Putney Hospital that everyone could welcome. And an outcome that would allow WPCC to ensure that they do what they should have done in the first place.
WPCC need take their responsibilities to protect the commons not only seriously but transparently. DD’s explanation to “correct misunderstandings” is laughable and derisory; it does nothing to help restore WPCC’s trashed reputation as custodians of the Commons. If this is the best the Conservators can offer as a defence to their “shady deal” I would suggest they all start thinking about resigning, prontissimo.
|
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 28/04/12 14:38:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 30/04/12 14:17:00 | Jim Maddan |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 30/04/12 14:43:00 | Rufus Hill |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 30/04/12 15:47:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 07/05/12 00:27:00 | Peter Carpenter |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 30/04/12 15:13:00 | Jim Maddan |
Hooray.......the parking solution for the teachers and mummies | 30/04/12 15:34:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Hooray.......the parking solution for the teachers and mummies | 30/04/12 16:05:00 | Rufus Hill |
consultation ends today.........link to WBC's website | 30/04/12 16:10:00 | John Cameron |
Re:consultation ends today.........link to WBC's website | 30/04/12 16:38:00 | Mairi Anne Bowen |
Re:Re:consultation ends today.........link to WBC's website | 30/04/12 18:27:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Scores on doors / place your bets..... | 01/05/12 20:49:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Scores on doors / place your bets..... | 01/05/12 21:26:00 | Alex Harvey |
Re:Re:Scores on doors / place your bets..... | 02/05/12 07:24:00 | Mairi Anne Bowen |
WBC's Environmental Services comments on application | 02/05/12 18:28:00 | John Cameron |
busy day for uploading objections | 02/05/12 23:07:00 | John Cameron |
another busy day for uploading objections...and today's quiz | 04/05/12 16:11:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 04/05/12 22:18:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 04/05/12 22:50:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 05/05/12 11:13:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 05/05/12 15:16:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 05/05/12 19:37:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 05/05/12 22:30:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 06/05/12 21:39:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 06/05/12 23:00:00 | Guy Cameron |
Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 07/05/12 10:22:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 07/05/12 17:46:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 07/05/12 19:07:00 | Rufus Hill |
Putney Hospital - why the excuse of "for commercial reasons"? | 08/05/12 15:09:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Putney Hospital - why the excuse of "for commercial reasons"? | 08/05/12 15:39:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Re:Putney Hospital - why the excuse of "for commercial reasons"? | 08/05/12 16:10:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 08/05/12 15:48:00 | Matt Palmer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 08/05/12 16:21:00 | Rufus Hill |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 08/05/12 16:50:00 | Martine Guy |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 08/05/12 17:07:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 09/05/12 13:17:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 09/05/12 19:46:00 | Bunny Payne |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 09/05/12 22:29:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 10/05/12 09:41:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 10/05/12 10:32:00 | Rufus Hill |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 10/05/12 14:38:00 | Stephen Walker |
Rt Hon J Greening's letter to WBC dated 25 April | 10/05/12 18:56:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Rt Hon J Greening's letter to WBC dated 25 April | 10/05/12 21:02:00 | Bunny Payne |
Re:Re:Rt Hon J Greening's letter to WBC dated 25 April | 11/05/12 12:51:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 10/05/12 22:19:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 10/05/12 22:32:00 | Stephen Walker |
Rocks Lane Traffic Signals | 10/05/12 22:51:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Rocks Lane Traffic Signals | 10/05/12 23:02:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Rocks Lane Traffic Signals | 11/05/12 08:50:00 | Sue Hammond |
WBC's website improvement and further objections | 11/05/12 20:33:00 | John Cameron |
Re:WBC's website improvement and further objections | 12/05/12 16:32:00 | Nicholas Evans |
The WPCC easement /GLA response / further objections | 14/05/12 16:49:00 | John Cameron |
just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 14/05/12 16:59:00 | John Cameron |
Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 14/05/12 19:09:00 | Sue Hammond |
Councillor Govindia's response to the Putney Society..... | 14/05/12 19:22:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Councillor Govindia's response to the Putney Society..... | 14/05/12 19:53:00 | Guy Cameron |
Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 14/05/12 19:47:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 14/05/12 21:11:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 14/05/12 21:29:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 14/05/12 21:54:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 15/05/12 01:17:00 | Nick Baker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...? | 15/05/12 08:04:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Exaggerated projections of need for primary school places | 15/05/12 12:02:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Cllr Govindia's response to Putney Society | 15/05/12 12:40:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Cllr Govindia's response to Putney Society | 15/05/12 12:49:00 | Matt Palmer |
Re:Re:Cllr Govindia's response to Putney Society | 15/05/12 13:45:00 | Andrew Wilson |
are the demand numbers accurate, or rubbish......? | 15/05/12 14:02:00 | John Cameron |
Re:are the demand numbers accurate, or rubbish......? | 15/05/12 15:17:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:Re:The WBC/WPCC Agreement | 15/05/12 15:41:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 16/05/12 13:10:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Traffic congestion | 16/05/12 14:42:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Traffic congestion | 16/05/12 14:47:00 | Mairi Anne Bowen |
Re:Re:Traffic congestion | 16/05/12 15:10:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Traffic congestion | 16/05/12 17:38:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Traffic congestion | 16/05/12 18:14:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Traffic congestion | 16/05/12 20:04:00 | Stephen Walker |
Traffic congestion and other stuff | 16/05/12 21:39:00 | John Cameron |
WBC's purchase of the Hospital Site | 17/05/12 09:47:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Traffic congestion | 17/05/12 10:21:00 | Mairi Anne Bowen |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 17/05/12 14:34:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 17/05/12 17:00:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 17/05/12 17:24:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 17/05/12 17:40:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 17/05/12 17:52:00 | Guy Cameron |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 17/05/12 17:53:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Wandsworth's application is not valid | 18/05/12 14:37:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Wandsworth's application is not valid | 18/05/12 14:49:00 | Mairi Anne Bowen |
Re:Re:Wandsworth's application is not valid | 19/05/12 10:06:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 19/05/12 18:12:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Certificate B and planning regulations | 19/05/12 18:51:00 | John Cameron |
Email to Seema Manchanda, and the invalid application | 21/05/12 10:22:00 | John Cameron |
Email to Seema Manchanda, and the invalid application, part 2 | 22/05/12 11:44:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Email to Seema Manchanda, and the invalid application, part 2 | 22/05/12 11:50:00 | Andrew Wilson |
WBC confirm the application is invalid.... | 22/05/12 11:52:00 | John Cameron |
Re:WBC confirm the application is invalid.... | 22/05/12 12:27:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:WBC confirm the application is invalid.... | 22/05/12 16:18:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Shoddy, shoddy, shoddy... | 22/05/12 18:23:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Shoddy, shoddy, shoddy... | 23/05/12 07:21:00 | John Cameron |
WBC update website to confirm invalid application | 23/05/12 10:18:00 | John Cameron |
Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 2 | 23/05/12 13:14:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 2 | 23/05/12 13:40:00 | Rufus Hill |
Re:Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 2 | 23/05/12 14:04:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC update website confirms invalid - but Planning Services carry on regardless | 23/05/12 15:06:00 | Nicholas Evans |
WBC update website confirms invalid - but Planning Services carry on regardless | 23/05/12 16:43:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 2 | 23/05/12 19:40:00 | D Plant |
Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 2 | 23/05/12 20:11:00 | Rufus Hill |
Incompetence and dishonesty | 24/05/12 07:17:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Incompetence and dishonesty | 24/05/12 08:32:00 | Michael John |
Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty | 24/05/12 09:43:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty | 24/05/12 13:28:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty - hiding the facts | 24/05/12 16:26:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty | 24/05/12 21:26:00 | Lucille Grant |
:Incompetence and dishonesty | 24/05/12 22:18:00 | John Cameron |
Re::Incompetence and dishonesty | 24/05/12 22:52:00 | Sue Hammond |
CIL | 25/05/12 06:56:00 | John Cameron |
Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC | 25/05/12 09:40:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC | 25/05/12 12:14:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC | 25/05/12 15:58:00 | Bernard Lopper |
Re:Re:Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC | 25/05/12 18:43:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty | 25/05/12 13:20:00 | Mark Smith |
Re:Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty | 25/05/12 14:10:00 | Matt Palmer |
Re:Re:Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty | 25/05/12 18:23:00 | Lucille Grant |
just a bit of fun........how to tell a resident to shove it, big time | 25/05/12 22:05:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty | 26/05/12 12:03:00 | Matt Palmer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 26/05/12 13:31:00 | Guy Cameron |
Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 26/05/12 16:54:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 27/05/12 12:20:00 | Jean Gilmore |
Your Local Guardian.......and the facts | 27/05/12 16:57:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts | 27/05/12 17:05:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts | 27/05/12 17:39:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts | 27/05/12 17:45:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts | 27/05/12 17:53:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts | 27/05/12 21:27:00 | Guy Sunda |
Your Local Guardian.......and the facts | 28/05/12 06:01:00 | John Cameron |
when is an objection not an objection......? | 28/05/12 09:19:00 | John Cameron |
Screw planning regulations... | 28/05/12 12:16:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Screw planning regulations... | 28/05/12 13:57:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Screw planning regulations... | 28/05/12 19:50:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Re:Screw planning regulations... | 28/05/12 22:00:00 | Sarah Roberts |
"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster | 29/05/12 09:38:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster | 29/05/12 11:01:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster | 29/05/12 11:52:00 | Bernard Lopper |
Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster | 29/05/12 11:59:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster | 29/05/12 13:03:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster | 29/05/12 16:02:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Screw planning regulations... | 02/06/12 13:09:00 | Guy Sunda |
WPCC objection | 30/05/12 08:49:00 | John Cameron |
Re:WPCC objection | 31/05/12 11:45:00 | Vic Condon |
Just silence from our Councillors . . . | 31/05/12 10:07:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Just silence from our Councillors . . . | 31/05/12 11:39:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Sir William Lancaster's Trust Deeds | 31/05/12 15:44:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Just silence from our Councillors . . . | 31/05/12 19:20:00 | John Cameron |
Not all the Councillors are silent.....just the ones with nothing to say . | 31/05/12 23:01:00 | John Cameron |
Putney Green website...... | 01/06/12 07:37:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Putney Green website...... | 01/06/12 09:44:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Re:Putney Green website...... | 01/06/12 19:24:00 | Andrew Wilson |
WPCC and WBC | 02/06/12 07:00:00 | John Cameron |
Justine Greening, understands frustration | 03/06/12 10:17:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration | 03/06/12 11:28:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration | 03/06/12 17:24:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration | 03/06/12 18:06:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration | 03/06/12 18:17:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration | 03/06/12 20:00:00 | Sarah Roberts |
WPCC & WBC | 06/06/12 16:39:00 | Rufus Hill |
Re:WPCC & WBC | 06/06/12 17:04:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:WPCC & WBC | 06/06/12 17:48:00 | Rufus Hill |
WPCC & WBC | 06/06/12 19:02:00 | John Cameron |
Re:WPCC & WBC | 06/06/12 19:54:00 | Stephen Walker |
Definition of minor errors... | 06/06/12 22:31:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Definition of minor errors... | 06/06/12 23:14:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Definition of minor errors... | 07/06/12 20:01:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Definition of minor errors... | 07/06/12 20:18:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of minor errors... | 07/06/12 22:17:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of minor errors... | 07/06/12 22:17:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Definition of a lie | 08/06/12 10:01:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Definition of a lie | 08/06/12 12:14:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 08/06/12 20:04:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 08/06/12 20:41:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 09/06/12 11:26:00 | David Devons |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 09/06/12 14:18:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 09/06/12 16:53:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 09/06/12 20:29:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 09/06/12 23:46:00 | James Stuart |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 08:19:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 07:23:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 08:22:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 09:58:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 11:22:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 11:27:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 11:30:00 | Sue Hammond |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 11:30:00 | Guy Cameron |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 11:47:00 | David Austin |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 14:39:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 11:55:00 | Peter Carpenter |
Wet, wet, wet | 10/06/12 12:23:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Wet, wet, wet | 10/06/12 14:29:00 | David Austin |
WPCC meetings | 10/06/12 14:43:00 | Jonathan Callaway |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 14:42:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 14:55:00 | David Austin |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 15:23:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 15:27:00 | Peter Carpenter |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 19:10:00 | James Stuart |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 19:18:00 | Peter Carpenter |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 20:25:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie | 10/06/12 21:14:00 | James Stuart |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 10/06/12 21:57:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 11/06/12 13:43:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 11/06/12 19:41:00 | James Stuart |
WPCC | 11/06/12 20:06:00 | John Cameron |
Re:WPCC | 11/06/12 21:39:00 | James Stuart |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 13:57:00 | Jenny Featherstone |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 14:16:00 | Peter Carpenter |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 14:18:00 | Bernard Lopper |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 17:13:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 17:22:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 17:38:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 18:15:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 12/06/12 18:57:00 | James Stuart |
Save Elliott School, submission to WBC | 12/06/12 20:02:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Save Elliott School, submission to WBC | 12/06/12 20:40:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Free Schools - A cause for concern | 12/06/12 20:41:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern | 12/06/12 21:52:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern | 12/06/12 23:10:00 | Bernard Lopper |
Re:Re:Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern | 13/06/12 07:57:00 | John Cameron |
The impact of free schools and some new projections from WBC | 13/06/12 11:46:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern | 13/06/12 00:41:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 15/06/12 00:13:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 15/06/12 11:39:00 | Victoria Richardson |
Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital | 15/06/12 12:18:00 | Lucille Grant |
WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 12:34:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 12:46:00 | Jane Holland |
Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 13:27:00 | Lucille Grant |
Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 16:56:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 17:43:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 18:16:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 19:25:00 | Rufus Hill |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 19:45:00 | Mairi Anne Bowen |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 20:13:00 | James Stuart |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 20:56:00 | Rufus Hill |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 21:29:00 | James Stuart |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 22:07:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting | 15/06/12 22:22:00 | Marjorie Ponsonby |
Maddan's views about the Conservators in 2006 | 15/06/12 22:10:00 | James Stuart |
Re:Maddan's views about the Conservators in 2006 | 16/06/12 08:44:00 | John Cameron |
Maddan shooting himself in the foot | 16/06/12 14:26:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Maddan shooting himself in the foot | 16/06/12 14:46:00 | Lucille Grant |
WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification | 18/06/12 11:44:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification | 18/06/12 12:47:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification | 18/06/12 12:55:00 | Guy Cameron |
Re:Re:Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification | 18/06/12 19:36:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification | 18/06/12 21:10:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Putney Hospital application to be considered by PAC on 16th of July | 19/06/12 15:35:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Putney Hospital application to be considered by PAC on 16th of July | 19/06/12 22:26:00 | John Cameron |
Trebles all round | 20/06/12 13:01:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 14:07:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 15:39:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 15:45:00 | Matt Palmer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 15:56:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 16:29:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 17:01:00 | Thomas Newton |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 18:21:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 18:33:00 | Matt Palmer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 18:38:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Trebles all round | 20/06/12 19:03:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 19:30:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 19:39:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 20/06/12 19:39:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round | 22/06/12 09:49:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Brandlehow Primary School | 21/06/12 11:02:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Local councillors' backing up residents.....not | 22/06/12 11:29:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not | 22/06/12 12:39:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not | 22/06/12 12:51:00 | John Cameron |
Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not | 22/06/12 13:34:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not | 22/06/12 14:35:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not | 22/06/12 15:29:00 | Stephen Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not | 22/06/12 16:09:00 | Matt Palmer |
An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 25/06/12 14:00:00 | Nicholas Evans |
The Councillors reply (28/06/2012) | 29/06/12 12:39:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:The Councillors reply (28/06/2012) | 29/06/12 18:16:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:The Councillors reply (28/06/2012) | 29/06/12 20:58:00 | Nicholas Evans |
:The Councillors reply (28/06/2012) | 29/06/12 22:33:00 | John Cameron |
Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 17:04:00 | Jeremy Matthews |
Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 17:44:00 | Nicholas Evans |
Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 18:03:00 | Sam Curtis |
Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 18:52:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 22:20:00 | Caroline Whitehead |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 22:44:00 | Vic Condon |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 23:03:00 | Andrew Wilson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 23:26:00 | Sarah Roberts |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 28/06/12 23:31:00 | Sarah Roberts |
:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 29/06/12 08:11:00 | John Cameron |
Re::An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions | 29/06/12 12:45:00 | John Horrocks |
Why the Councillors got it all wrong | 30/06/12 15:08:00 | Nicholas Evans |