Forum Message

Topic: Screw planning regulations...
Posted by: Sarah Roberts
Date/Time: 28/05/12 12:16:00

The filing of WPCC's objection under General Comment is just one small point to illustrate planning officers' obvious bias to developers.  Another I would like everyone reading this forum to take note of is the more serious bias shown to a local serial developer in overlooking the assessment of potential contamination at his development site; not once, not twice but three times.

It is worth nothing that this local family of serial developers are well known to Wandsworth Council because together they partnered the development of a large block of flats in the 1960s which today blights the heart of West Hill Road Conservation Area. 

Over a decade the same developer applied to Wandsworth Council thee times to demolish his former filling station and repair/service workshop and turn the land into a greedy 6 storey block of 26 residential flats.  Given the commercial history of this site can anyone explain why the Applicant was allowed to submit applications in 2001, 2005 and 2010 each one lacking the statutory requirement of a statement on potential contamination?

Anyone applying for planning permission on the Council's planning portal can see that a statement on contamination is an elementary, Stage 1, application requirement; especially if you are the owner of a former filling station (1920s-1992) which still has petrol tanks beneath its forecourt; your site is still to this day in use as a car service and repair workshop; your garage roof is made of degraded asbestos concrete (circa 1950s).

Can anyone explain to me how and why Wandsworth Council could waive such a requirement for three separate applications for the same development site?

Can anyone explain to me why the site was never investigated for contamination despite the Applicant applying to convert it from commercial use into residential use; despite planning legislation which very clearly states that an investigation of potential contamination is required in order to protect those people most at risk in a commercial-to-residential conversion like this, ie. pregnant women and children (PPS23 Annex 2)? 

Can anyone explain to me why the planning permissions in 2001 and 2005 contained no Management Plan or Planning Conditions for remediation or cleaning up of the site BEFORE the construction of the residential flats could begin?

My application to the Council's Freedom of Information Officer under the Environment Information Regulations showed that the issue of contamination had never been the subject of any recorded internal communication what so ever, so how can it be the case that Wandsworth Council 'assumed' no potential for contamination at a commercial site such as this with such a long history of handling contaminants?

I and a resident barrister had a meeting with Justine Greening MP on the 19th November 2010 specifically to raise this issue.  A great deal of pressure was brought to bear by me and conservation area residents on Wandsworth's Borough Planner (collective term). Eventually the Council's Head of Development Control, clarified by an e-mail from the PAC Chairman Cllr. Cuff confirmed that the Developer would have to investigate the site for potential contamination FIRST, BEFORE he was able to start his development.   Yet by May 2011 the Council had reneged, allowing the Developer to commence his development triggering his planning permission indefinitely.

The site was never assessed for potential contamination.  Instead WBC did all they possibly could to ensure the Developer could go ahead with the minimum required to meet his planning conditions.   It remains that Wandsworth Council have never taken any responsibility for potential contamination of the site.  They washed their hands of the matter and all this despite our MP stating to me, face-to-face that this matter was a "serious worry". 

In planning matters this Council NEVER represents the interests of existing residents.  Consultation is a tick-box exercise for developers pure and simple and a money spinner for consultants, architects and a certain councillor to extract yet more consultancy cash from the planning process.   WBC extend ALL favour and ALL flexibility to Developers, wantonly flouting planning regulations. Whilst our MP sits on the fence appeasing residents, echoing our concerns but doing bugger all to hold the Borough Planner (collective term) to account.

It is a disgrace.
It is criminal.

John, I commend you for your determination.  We need more residents like you to expose what's going on at Town Hall and we desperately need a convincing opposition party and a thorough investigation of planning practices.





Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Continuation thread for Putney Hospital28/04/12 14:38:00 Vic Condon
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital30/04/12 14:17:00 Jim Maddan
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital30/04/12 14:43:00 Rufus Hill
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital30/04/12 15:47:00 Lucille Grant
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital07/05/12 00:27:00 Peter Carpenter
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital30/04/12 15:13:00 Jim Maddan
      Hooray.......the parking solution for the teachers and mummies30/04/12 15:34:00 John Cameron
         Re:Hooray.......the parking solution for the teachers and mummies30/04/12 16:05:00 Rufus Hill
   consultation ends today.........link to WBC's website30/04/12 16:10:00 John Cameron
      Re:consultation ends today.........link to WBC's website30/04/12 16:38:00 Mairi Anne Bowen
         Re:Re:consultation ends today.........link to WBC's website30/04/12 18:27:00 Nicholas Evans
   Scores on doors / place your bets.....01/05/12 20:49:00 John Cameron
      Re:Scores on doors / place your bets.....01/05/12 21:26:00 Alex Harvey
         Re:Re:Scores on doors / place your bets.....02/05/12 07:24:00 Mairi Anne Bowen
   WBC's Environmental Services comments on application02/05/12 18:28:00 John Cameron
      busy day for uploading objections 02/05/12 23:07:00 John Cameron
         another busy day for uploading objections...and today's quiz04/05/12 16:11:00 John Cameron
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital04/05/12 22:18:00 Andrew Wilson
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital04/05/12 22:50:00 Martine Guy
         Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital05/05/12 11:13:00 Vic Condon
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital05/05/12 15:16:00 Martine Guy
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital05/05/12 19:37:00 Vic Condon
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital05/05/12 22:30:00 Martine Guy
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital06/05/12 21:39:00 Andrew Wilson
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital06/05/12 23:00:00 Guy Cameron
                           Continuation thread for Putney Hospital07/05/12 10:22:00 John Cameron
                              Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital07/05/12 17:46:00 Andrew Wilson
                                 Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital07/05/12 19:07:00 Rufus Hill
                                    Putney Hospital - why the excuse of "for commercial reasons"?08/05/12 15:09:00 Nicholas Evans
                                       Re:Putney Hospital - why the excuse of "for commercial reasons"?08/05/12 15:39:00 John Cameron
                                          Re:Re:Putney Hospital - why the excuse of "for commercial reasons"?08/05/12 16:10:00 Vic Condon
         Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital08/05/12 15:48:00 Matt Palmer
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital08/05/12 16:21:00 Rufus Hill
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital08/05/12 16:50:00 Martine Guy
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital08/05/12 17:07:00 Nicholas Evans
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital09/05/12 13:17:00 Andrew Wilson
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital09/05/12 19:46:00 Bunny Payne
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital09/05/12 22:29:00 Andrew Wilson
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital10/05/12 09:41:00 Nicholas Evans
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital10/05/12 10:32:00 Rufus Hill
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital10/05/12 14:38:00 Stephen Walker
                                    Rt Hon J Greening's letter to WBC dated 25 April 10/05/12 18:56:00 John Cameron
                                       Re:Rt Hon J Greening's letter to WBC dated 25 April 10/05/12 21:02:00 Bunny Payne
                                          Re:Re:Rt Hon J Greening's letter to WBC dated 25 April 11/05/12 12:51:00 Nicholas Evans
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital10/05/12 22:19:00 Andrew Wilson
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital10/05/12 22:32:00 Stephen Walker
         Rocks Lane Traffic Signals10/05/12 22:51:00 Vic Condon
            Re:Rocks Lane Traffic Signals10/05/12 23:02:00 Andrew Wilson
               Re:Re:Rocks Lane Traffic Signals11/05/12 08:50:00 Sue Hammond
   WBC's website improvement and further objections 11/05/12 20:33:00 John Cameron
      Re:WBC's website improvement and further objections 12/05/12 16:32:00 Nicholas Evans
   The WPCC easement /GLA response / further objections14/05/12 16:49:00 John Cameron
      just how long does it take to upload objections...?14/05/12 16:59:00 John Cameron
         Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...?14/05/12 19:09:00 Sue Hammond
            Councillor Govindia's response to the Putney Society.....14/05/12 19:22:00 John Cameron
               Re:Councillor Govindia's response to the Putney Society.....14/05/12 19:53:00 Guy Cameron
            Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...?14/05/12 19:47:00 Stephen Walker
               Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...?14/05/12 21:11:00 Andrew Wilson
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...?14/05/12 21:29:00 Stephen Walker
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...?14/05/12 21:54:00 Andrew Wilson
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...?15/05/12 01:17:00 Nick Baker
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:just how long does it take to upload objections...?15/05/12 08:04:00 John Cameron
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Exaggerated projections of need for primary school places15/05/12 12:02:00 Nicholas Evans
                           Cllr Govindia's response to Putney Society15/05/12 12:40:00 John Cameron
                              Re:Cllr Govindia's response to Putney Society15/05/12 12:49:00 Matt Palmer
                                 Re:Re:Cllr Govindia's response to Putney Society15/05/12 13:45:00 Andrew Wilson
                                    are the demand numbers accurate, or rubbish......?15/05/12 14:02:00 John Cameron
                                       Re:are the demand numbers accurate, or rubbish......?15/05/12 15:17:00 Caroline Whitehead
                                          Re:Re:The WBC/WPCC Agreement15/05/12 15:41:00 Nicholas Evans
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital16/05/12 13:10:00 Andrew Wilson
      Traffic congestion16/05/12 14:42:00 Stephen Walker
         Re:Traffic congestion16/05/12 14:47:00 Mairi Anne Bowen
            Re:Re:Traffic congestion16/05/12 15:10:00 Lucille Grant
         Re:Traffic congestion16/05/12 17:38:00 Andrew Wilson
            Re:Re:Traffic congestion16/05/12 18:14:00 Nicholas Evans
               Re:Re:Re:Traffic congestion16/05/12 20:04:00 Stephen Walker
                  Traffic congestion and other stuff16/05/12 21:39:00 John Cameron
                     WBC's purchase of the Hospital Site17/05/12 09:47:00 John Cameron
         Re:Traffic congestion17/05/12 10:21:00 Mairi Anne Bowen
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital17/05/12 14:34:00 Andrew Wilson
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital17/05/12 17:00:00 Nicholas Evans
         Continuation thread for Putney Hospital17/05/12 17:24:00 John Cameron
            Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital17/05/12 17:40:00 Sue Hammond
               Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital17/05/12 17:52:00 Guy Cameron
            Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital17/05/12 17:53:00 Nicholas Evans
               Wandsworth's application is not valid18/05/12 14:37:00 John Cameron
                  Re:Wandsworth's application is not valid18/05/12 14:49:00 Mairi Anne Bowen
                     Re:Re:Wandsworth's application is not valid19/05/12 10:06:00 Roland Gilmore
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital19/05/12 18:12:00 Andrew Wilson
      Certificate B and planning regulations19/05/12 18:51:00 John Cameron
         Email to Seema Manchanda, and the invalid application21/05/12 10:22:00 John Cameron
   Email to Seema Manchanda, and the invalid application, part 222/05/12 11:44:00 John Cameron
      Re:Email to Seema Manchanda, and the invalid application, part 222/05/12 11:50:00 Andrew Wilson
      WBC confirm the application is invalid....22/05/12 11:52:00 John Cameron
         Re:WBC confirm the application is invalid....22/05/12 12:27:00 Sue Hammond
            Re:Re:WBC confirm the application is invalid....22/05/12 16:18:00 Sarah Roberts
               Shoddy, shoddy, shoddy...22/05/12 18:23:00 John Cameron
                  Re:Shoddy, shoddy, shoddy...23/05/12 07:21:00 John Cameron
   WBC update website to confirm invalid application23/05/12 10:18:00 John Cameron
      Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 223/05/12 13:14:00 John Cameron
         Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 223/05/12 13:40:00 Rufus Hill
            Re:Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 223/05/12 14:04:00 Vic Condon
               Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC update website confirms invalid - but Planning Services carry on regardless23/05/12 15:06:00 Nicholas Evans
                  WBC update website confirms invalid - but Planning Services carry on regardless23/05/12 16:43:00 John Cameron
            Re:Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 223/05/12 19:40:00 D Plant
               Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC update website to confirm invalid application, part 223/05/12 20:11:00 Rufus Hill
                  Incompetence and dishonesty24/05/12 07:17:00 Sarah Roberts
                     Re:Incompetence and dishonesty24/05/12 08:32:00 Michael John
                        Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty24/05/12 09:43:00 Sarah Roberts
                           Re:Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty24/05/12 13:28:00 Stephen Walker
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty - hiding the facts24/05/12 16:26:00 Nicholas Evans
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Incompetence and dishonesty24/05/12 21:26:00 Lucille Grant
                                 :Incompetence and dishonesty24/05/12 22:18:00 John Cameron
                                    Re::Incompetence and dishonesty24/05/12 22:52:00 Sue Hammond
                                       CIL 25/05/12 06:56:00 John Cameron
                                          Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC25/05/12 09:40:00 John Cameron
                                             Re:Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC25/05/12 12:14:00 Lucille Grant
                                             Re:Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC25/05/12 15:58:00 Bernard Lopper
                                                Re:Re:Read this excellent article about Elliot, Greening and WBC25/05/12 18:43:00 Caroline Whitehead
                                       Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty25/05/12 13:20:00 Mark Smith
                                          Re:Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty25/05/12 14:10:00 Matt Palmer
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty25/05/12 18:23:00 Lucille Grant
                                                just a bit of fun........how to tell a resident to shove it, big time25/05/12 22:05:00 John Cameron
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Incompetence and dishonesty26/05/12 12:03:00 Matt Palmer
                                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital26/05/12 13:31:00 Guy Cameron
                                                      Continuation thread for Putney Hospital26/05/12 16:54:00 John Cameron
                                                         Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital27/05/12 12:20:00 Jean Gilmore
                                                            Your Local Guardian.......and the facts27/05/12 16:57:00 John Cameron
                                                               Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts27/05/12 17:05:00 Sue Hammond
                                                                  Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts27/05/12 17:39:00 Roland Gilmore
                                                                     Re:Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts27/05/12 17:45:00 Sue Hammond
                                                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts27/05/12 17:53:00 Lucille Grant
                                                                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Your Local Guardian.......and the facts27/05/12 21:27:00 Guy Sunda
                                                                              Your Local Guardian.......and the facts28/05/12 06:01:00 John Cameron
   when is an objection not an objection......?28/05/12 09:19:00 John Cameron
      Screw planning regulations...28/05/12 12:16:00 Sarah Roberts
         Re:Screw planning regulations...28/05/12 13:57:00 Andrew Wilson
            Re:Re:Screw planning regulations...28/05/12 19:50:00 Roland Gilmore
               Re:Re:Re:Screw planning regulations...28/05/12 22:00:00 Sarah Roberts
                  "To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster29/05/12 09:38:00 Nicholas Evans
                     Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster29/05/12 11:01:00 Lucille Grant
                        Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster29/05/12 11:52:00 Bernard Lopper
                        Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster29/05/12 11:59:00 Nicholas Evans
                           Re:Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster29/05/12 13:03:00 Andrew Wilson
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:"To be used in perpetuity as a general hospital" Sir William Lancaster29/05/12 16:02:00 Caroline Whitehead
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Screw planning regulations...02/06/12 13:09:00 Guy Sunda
   WPCC objection30/05/12 08:49:00 John Cameron
      Re:WPCC objection31/05/12 11:45:00 Vic Condon
   Just silence from our Councillors . . .31/05/12 10:07:00 Nicholas Evans
      Re:Just silence from our Councillors . . .31/05/12 11:39:00 Caroline Whitehead
         Sir William Lancaster's Trust Deeds31/05/12 15:44:00 Nicholas Evans
      Re:Just silence from our Councillors . . .31/05/12 19:20:00 John Cameron
         Not all the Councillors are silent.....just the ones with nothing to say .31/05/12 23:01:00 John Cameron
   Putney Green website......01/06/12 07:37:00 John Cameron
      Re:Putney Green website......01/06/12 09:44:00 Sarah Roberts
         Re:Re:Putney Green website......01/06/12 19:24:00 Andrew Wilson
   WPCC and WBC02/06/12 07:00:00 John Cameron
   Justine Greening, understands frustration03/06/12 10:17:00 John Cameron
      Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration03/06/12 11:28:00 Sue Hammond
         Re:Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration03/06/12 17:24:00 Vic Condon
            Re:Re:Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration03/06/12 18:06:00 Sue Hammond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration03/06/12 18:17:00 Sue Hammond
      Re:Justine Greening, understands frustration03/06/12 20:00:00 Sarah Roberts
         WPCC & WBC06/06/12 16:39:00 Rufus Hill
            Re:WPCC & WBC06/06/12 17:04:00 Nicholas Evans
               Re:Re:WPCC & WBC06/06/12 17:48:00 Rufus Hill
                  WPCC & WBC06/06/12 19:02:00 John Cameron
                     Re:WPCC & WBC06/06/12 19:54:00 Stephen Walker
                        Definition of minor errors...06/06/12 22:31:00 John Cameron
                           Re:Definition of minor errors...06/06/12 23:14:00 Andrew Wilson
                              Re:Re:Definition of minor errors...07/06/12 20:01:00 Stephen Walker
                                 Re:Re:Re:Definition of minor errors...07/06/12 20:18:00 Andrew Wilson
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of minor errors...07/06/12 22:17:00 Sarah Roberts
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of minor errors...07/06/12 22:17:00 Sarah Roberts
                                       Definition of a lie08/06/12 10:01:00 John Cameron
                                          Re:Definition of a lie08/06/12 12:14:00 Vic Condon
                                             Re:Re:Definition of a lie08/06/12 20:04:00 Stephen Walker
                                                Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie08/06/12 20:41:00 Nicholas Evans
                                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie09/06/12 11:26:00 David Devons
                                                      Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie09/06/12 14:18:00 Nicholas Evans
                                                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie09/06/12 16:53:00 Vic Condon
                                                            Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie09/06/12 20:29:00 Andrew Wilson
                                                               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie09/06/12 23:46:00 James Stuart
                                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 08:19:00 Sue Hammond
                                                               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 07:23:00 Sarah Roberts
                                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 08:22:00 Roland Gilmore
                                                                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 09:58:00 Nicholas Evans
                                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 11:22:00 Lucille Grant
                                                                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 11:27:00 Nicholas Evans
                                                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 11:30:00 Sue Hammond
                                                                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 11:30:00 Guy Cameron
                                                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 11:47:00 David Austin
                                                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 14:39:00 Lucille Grant
                                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 11:55:00 Peter Carpenter
                                                                     Wet, wet, wet10/06/12 12:23:00 John Cameron
                                                                        Re:Wet, wet, wet10/06/12 14:29:00 David Austin
                                                                           WPCC meetings10/06/12 14:43:00 Jonathan Callaway
                                                                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 14:42:00 Lucille Grant
                                                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 14:55:00 David Austin
                                                                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 15:23:00 Roland Gilmore
                                                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 15:27:00 Peter Carpenter
                                                                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 19:10:00 James Stuart
                                                                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 19:18:00 Peter Carpenter
                                                                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 20:25:00 Andrew Wilson
                                                                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Definition of a lie10/06/12 21:14:00 James Stuart
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital10/06/12 21:57:00 Vic Condon
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital11/06/12 13:43:00 Andrew Wilson
         Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital11/06/12 19:41:00 James Stuart
            WPCC 11/06/12 20:06:00 John Cameron
               Re:WPCC 11/06/12 21:39:00 James Stuart
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 13:57:00 Jenny Featherstone
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 14:16:00 Peter Carpenter
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 14:18:00 Bernard Lopper
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 17:13:00 Roland Gilmore
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 17:22:00 Andrew Wilson
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 17:38:00 Caroline Whitehead
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 18:15:00 Andrew Wilson
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital12/06/12 18:57:00 James Stuart
                           Save Elliott School, submission to WBC12/06/12 20:02:00 John Cameron
                              Re:Save Elliott School, submission to WBC12/06/12 20:40:00 Andrew Wilson
                              Free Schools - A cause for concern12/06/12 20:41:00 John Cameron
                                 Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern12/06/12 21:52:00 Roland Gilmore
                                    Re:Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern12/06/12 23:10:00 Bernard Lopper
                                       Re:Re:Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern13/06/12 07:57:00 John Cameron
                                       The impact of free schools and some new projections from WBC13/06/12 11:46:00 Nicholas Evans
                                    Re:Re:Free Schools - A cause for concern13/06/12 00:41:00 Sarah Roberts
   Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital15/06/12 00:13:00 Vic Condon
      Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital15/06/12 11:39:00 Victoria Richardson
         Re:Re:Re:Continuation thread for Putney Hospital15/06/12 12:18:00 Lucille Grant
         WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 12:34:00 Nicholas Evans
            Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 12:46:00 Jane Holland
               Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 13:27:00 Lucille Grant
                  Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 16:56:00 Andrew Wilson
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 17:43:00 Nicholas Evans
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 18:16:00 Andrew Wilson
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 19:25:00 Rufus Hill
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 19:45:00 Mairi Anne Bowen
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 20:13:00 James Stuart
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 20:56:00 Rufus Hill
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 21:29:00 James Stuart
                                          Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 22:07:00 Stephen Walker
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC Annual Meeting15/06/12 22:22:00 Marjorie Ponsonby
   Maddan's views about the Conservators in 200615/06/12 22:10:00 James Stuart
      Re:Maddan's views about the Conservators in 200616/06/12 08:44:00 John Cameron
         Maddan shooting himself in the foot16/06/12 14:26:00 Andrew Wilson
            Re:Maddan shooting himself in the foot16/06/12 14:46:00 Lucille Grant
   WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification18/06/12 11:44:00 Nicholas Evans
      Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification18/06/12 12:47:00 Caroline Whitehead
         Re:Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification18/06/12 12:55:00 Guy Cameron
            Re:Re:Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification18/06/12 19:36:00 Andrew Wilson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:WPCC and Putney Lower Common - an attempt at clarification18/06/12 21:10:00 Nicholas Evans
                  Putney Hospital application to be considered by PAC on 16th of July19/06/12 15:35:00 Nicholas Evans
                     Re:Putney Hospital application to be considered by PAC on 16th of July19/06/12 22:26:00 John Cameron
   Trebles all round20/06/12 13:01:00 John Cameron
      Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 14:07:00 Stephen Walker
         Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 15:39:00 Roland Gilmore
            Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 15:45:00 Matt Palmer
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 15:56:00 Stephen Walker
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 16:29:00 Nicholas Evans
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 17:01:00 Thomas Newton
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 18:21:00 Andrew Wilson
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 18:33:00 Matt Palmer
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 18:38:00 Caroline Whitehead
                              Trebles all round20/06/12 19:03:00 John Cameron
                                 Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 19:30:00 Stephen Walker
                                 Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 19:39:00 Caroline Whitehead
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round20/06/12 19:39:00 Stephen Walker
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Trebles all round22/06/12 09:49:00 Sarah Roberts
   Brandlehow Primary School21/06/12 11:02:00 Nicholas Evans
   Local councillors' backing up residents.....not22/06/12 11:29:00 John Cameron
      Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not22/06/12 12:39:00 Nicholas Evans
         Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not22/06/12 12:51:00 John Cameron
      Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not22/06/12 13:34:00 Stephen Walker
         Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not22/06/12 14:35:00 Sarah Roberts
            Re:Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not22/06/12 15:29:00 Stephen Walker
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Local councillors' backing up residents.....not22/06/12 16:09:00 Matt Palmer
   An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions25/06/12 14:00:00 Nicholas Evans
      The Councillors reply (28/06/2012)29/06/12 12:39:00 Nicholas Evans
         Re:The Councillors reply (28/06/2012)29/06/12 18:16:00 Andrew Wilson
            Re:Re:The Councillors reply (28/06/2012)29/06/12 20:58:00 Nicholas Evans
               :The Councillors reply (28/06/2012) 29/06/12 22:33:00 John Cameron
      Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 17:04:00 Jeremy Matthews
         Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 17:44:00 Nicholas Evans
            Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 18:03:00 Sam Curtis
               Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 18:52:00 Andrew Wilson
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 22:20:00 Caroline Whitehead
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 22:44:00 Vic Condon
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 23:03:00 Andrew Wilson
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 23:26:00 Sarah Roberts
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions28/06/12 23:31:00 Sarah Roberts
                              :An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions29/06/12 08:11:00 John Cameron
                                 Re::An "Open Letter" to Thamesfield Councillors calls for n open meeting and declaration of their positions29/06/12 12:45:00 John Horrocks
   Why the Councillors got it all wrong30/06/12 15:08:00 Nicholas Evans

Forum Home