Forum Message

Topic: 7 Labour MPs have whip rempved
Posted by: Andy Pike
Date/Time: 24/07/24 11:51:00

For voting against the leadership yesterday.
Seem to recall outrage on here when the Tories did similar.

Ah well.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 11:51:00 Andy Pike
   Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 12:05:00 John Kettlekey
      Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 12:07:00 Michael Brigo
         Re:Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 12:34:00 Steven Rose
      Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 12:29:00 David Ainsworth
         Reply24/07/24 12:40:00 Michael Ixer
            Re:Reply24/07/24 12:54:00 David Ainsworth
               Reply24/07/24 13:49:00 Michael Ixer
                  Re:Reply24/07/24 16:25:00 Robert Wheeler
                     Re:Re:Reply24/07/24 18:03:00 Gerry Boyce
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply25/07/24 09:12:00 John Kettlekey
                  Re:Reply24/07/24 17:59:00 David Ainsworth
               Re:Re:Reply25/07/24 11:23:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Re:Re:Reply25/07/24 12:51:00 David Ainsworth
            Re:Reply24/07/24 18:22:00 Ivonne Holliday
               Re:Re:Reply24/07/24 20:21:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Re:Reply24/07/24 20:28:00 Ed Robinson
               Reply24/07/24 21:59:00 Michael Ixer
   Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 20:48:00 Steven Rose
      Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 21:52:00 Ed Robinson
   Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved24/07/24 21:55:00 Sue Hammond
      Reply24/07/24 22:08:00 Michael Ixer
         Re:Reply24/07/24 22:26:00 Ed Robinson
            Re:Re:Reply24/07/24 23:53:00 Steven Rose
               38,000 gone25/07/24 10:00:00 David Ainsworth
                  Re:38,000 gone25/07/24 11:47:00 John Hawkes
                     Re:Re:38,000 gone25/07/24 13:55:00 David Ainsworth
                        Re:Re:Re:38,000 gone26/07/24 14:19:00 John Hawkes
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:38,000 gone26/07/24 15:40:00 David Ainsworth
               Would you buy a used car ... ?25/07/24 10:14:00 David Ainsworth
               41 For, 195? Against25/07/24 10:39:00 David Ainsworth
               Putin visit "premature and inappropriate" 200025/07/24 11:11:00 David Ainsworth
            Reply25/07/24 00:15:00 Michael Ixer
               Re:Reply25/07/24 11:57:00 Steven Rose
                  Re:Re:Reply25/07/24 12:35:00 Sue Hammond
                     Re:Re:Re:Reply25/07/24 12:48:00 David Ainsworth
                  Re:Re:Reply25/07/24 15:39:00 David Ainsworth
                     Re:Re:Re:Reply26/07/24 14:33:00 John Hawkes
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply26/07/24 15:18:00 David Ainsworth
                        Oh time is a great healer, or not. 26/07/24 15:32:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Oh time is a great healer, or not. 26/07/24 15:36:00 Philippa Bond
                              Re:Re:Oh time is a great healer, or not. 26/07/24 15:49:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Oh time is a great healer, or not. 27/07/24 11:07:00 John Hawkes
   Reply25/07/24 12:28:00 Michael Ixer
      Re:Reply25/07/24 14:05:00 David Ainsworth
         Reply25/07/24 15:00:00 Michael Ixer
      Pre-emptive strike then?25/07/24 14:52:00 David Ainsworth
         Re:Pre-emptive strike then?26/07/24 18:43:00 Philippa Bond
            Hole-digging stop26/07/24 18:45:00 David Ainsworth
   Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved26/07/24 16:07:00 Philippa Bond
      Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved26/07/24 16:58:00 John Kettlekey
         Re:Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved26/07/24 17:44:00 Robert Wheeler
         Re:Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved26/07/24 20:23:00 Ed Robinson
            Re:Re:Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved27/07/24 11:50:00 Steven Rose
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:7 Labour MPs have whip rempved27/07/24 12:11:00 John Kettlekey
                  Subsidising the cost of structural inequality in favour of the rich27/07/24 12:28:00 David Ainsworth
                     Re:Subsidising the cost of structural inequality in favour of the rich27/07/24 13:36:00 Steven Rose
                        Re:Re:Subsidising the cost of structural inequality in favour of the rich27/07/24 13:53:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Re:Re:Subsidising the cost of structural inequality in favour of the rich27/07/24 14:35:00 Steven Rose
                              Reply27/07/24 14:52:00 Michael Ixer
                                 Re:Reply27/07/24 16:06:00 Steven Rose
                                    Reply27/07/24 16:59:00 Michael Ixer
                     Re:Subsidising the cost of structural inequality in favour of the rich27/07/24 16:17:00 John Hawkes
                        Re:Re:Subsidising the cost of structural inequality in favour of the rich27/07/24 19:33:00 Ed Robinson
                           Reply27/07/24 19:51:00 Sue Hammond
                              Re:Reply27/07/24 20:04:00 David Ainsworth
                              Re:Reply28/07/24 11:06:00 Ed Robinson
                        Envy and/or an unwillingness to recognise that 'life just ain't fair'27/07/24 20:01:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Envy and/or an unwillingness to recognise that 'life just ain't fair'28/07/24 12:11:00 John Hawkes
                              Re:Re:Envy and/or an unwillingness to recognise that 'life just ain't fair'28/07/24 17:33:00 Steven Rose
                                 Re:Re:Reeves Caving In To The Unions Already?28/07/24 22:00:00 Sue Hammond
                                 Re:Re:Re:Envy and/or an unwillingness to recognise that 'life just ain't fair'29/07/24 12:28:00 John Hawkes
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Envy and/or an unwillingness to recognise that 'life just ain't fair'30/07/24 10:04:00 Philippa Bond

Forum Home