| Topic: | Re:Re:Reply | |
| Posted by: | Lucille Grant | |
| Date/Time: | 06/12/24 11:01:00 |
| It's pretty obvious to anyone who has recently visited the flagship Marble Arch M & S that it has been run down on purpose so that it is deemed as not worth being saved at all. From my personal view the frontage on Oxford Street should be retained while a new fit for purpose store is built behind it. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch | 05/12/24 18:56:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch | 05/12/24 19:29:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
| Reply | 05/12/24 19:50:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch | 05/12/24 19:40:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch | 05/12/24 20:13:00 | Michael Brigo |
| Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch | 05/12/24 21:47:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Reply | 05/12/24 21:58:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Reply | 05/12/24 23:52:00 | Andy Pike |
| Reply | 06/12/24 02:14:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Reply | 06/12/24 02:36:00 | Ed Robinson |
| Reply | 06/12/24 09:11:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Reply | 06/12/24 10:09:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Re:Re:Reply | 06/12/24 11:01:00 | Lucille Grant |
| Reply | 06/12/24 11:05:00 | Martine Guy |
| Loss upon loss | 06/12/24 11:54:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Reply | 06/12/24 12:01:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Reply | 06/12/24 12:12:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Reply | 06/12/24 12:11:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Reply | 18/12/24 20:18:00 | Martine Guy |
| Reply | 18/12/24 22:03:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Re:Reply | 19/12/24 19:31:00 | Philippa Bond |
| Reply | 19/12/24 19:50:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Re:Reply | 19/12/24 20:03:00 | Sue Hammond |