I'm not a fan of Gove or Rayner, but the main issue here seems to be that the property wasn't considered valued enough to be protected i.e listed. Perhaps the focus should be on to get more properties listed rather than expecting government to fight the courts. Also if a building is worth saving it is worth saving regardless of its green credentials which may change depending upon the current price of energy. https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?uid=1479261&resourceID=7

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch	05/12/24 18:56:00	Martine Guy
Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch	05/12/24 19:29:00	Ivonne Holliday
Reply	05/12/24 19:50:00	Martine Guy
Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch	05/12/24 19:40:00	Richard Carter
Re:Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch	05/12/24 20:13:00	Michael Brigo
Re:Angela Rayner gives the go ahead for the demolition/redevelopment of M&S Marble Arch	05/12/24 21:47:00	Sue Hammond
Reply	05/12/24 21:58:00	Martine Guy
Re:Reply	05/12/24 23:52:00	Andy Pike
Reply	06/12/24 02:14:00	Martine Guy
Re:Reply	06/12/24 02:36:00	Ed Robinson
Reply	06/12/24 09:11:00	Martine Guy
Re:Reply	06/12/24 10:09:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Reply	06/12/24 11:01:00	Lucille Grant
Reply	06/12/24 11:05:00	Martine Guy
Loss upon loss	06/12/24 11:54:00	David Ainsworth
Reply	06/12/24 12:01:00	Martine Guy
Re:Reply	06/12/24 12:12:00	David Ainsworth
Reply	06/12/24 12:11:00	Sue Hammond
Reply	18/12/24 20:18:00	Martine Guy
Reply	18/12/24 22:03:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Reply	19/12/24 19:31:00	Philippa Bond
Reply	19/12/24 19:50:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Reply	19/12/24 20:03:00	Sue Hammond

Forum Home