Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...
Posted by: Steven Rose
Date/Time: 14/02/26 11:57:00

I hold no brief for Jim Ratcliffe. I didn’t like the way he tried to cut costs at Manchester United by sacking over 100 staff and making the survivors of the cull pay for their own lunches while he wasted millions on paying off two useless managers and a sporting director. But too much has been made of his use of the word ‘colonised’ by virtue signallers like Andy Burnham who called it ‘insulting’ and Rachel Reeves who said it was ‘disgusting’.  Clearly colonisers is not the correct expression to describe people who have entered the country legally and contribute to the economy but it exactly describes illegal migrants who have arrived here uninvited. However the point that Ratcliffe was trying to make is that the UK has undergone an unprecedented wave of immigration in recent years, with the population increasing by over 10 million since 2000, which has placed an intolerable strain on the infrastructure.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 09:55:00 Richard Carter
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 10:09:00 David Ainsworth
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 11:57:00 Steven Rose
         Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 13:08:00 David Ainsworth
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 13:43:00 John Hawkes
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 12:55:00 John Hawkes
   Reply14/02/26 13:18:00 Michael Ixer
      Re:Reply14/02/26 14:14:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 15:54:00 Jonathan Callaway
            Re:Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 16:07:00 Sue Hammond
            Re:Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 16:42:00 David Ainsworth
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply15/02/26 12:43:00 John Hawkes
         Reply14/02/26 17:26:00 Michael Ixer
            Re:Reply14/02/26 17:37:00 Gerry Boyce
               Reply14/02/26 17:40:00 Michael Ixer
                  Re:Reply14/02/26 17:46:00 David Ainsworth
                     Reply14/02/26 18:07:00 Michael Ixer
                  Re:Reply14/02/26 18:14:00 Gerry Boyce
                     Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 18:39:00 Gerry Boyce
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply15/02/26 18:31:00 Gerry Boyce
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer..."But not totally wrong in what he claims18/02/26 15:53:00 John Hawkes
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer..."But is wrong in what he claims19/02/26 12:10:00 Philippa Bond
         Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer..."But is wrong in what he claims20/02/26 17:12:00 John Hawkes
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 14:09:00 John Hawkes
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 15:24:00 Michael Brigo
         Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 15:50:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 16:18:00 Michael Brigo
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 16:52:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 17:34:00 Philippa Bond
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong25/02/26 15:39:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 17:54:00 Michael Brigo
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong25/02/26 15:41:00 John Hawkes

Forum Home