Forum Message

Topic: Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...
Posted by: David Ainsworth
Date/Time: 14/02/26 10:09:00

"Approximately 60% of global billionaire wealth is derived from inheritance, monopoly power, or crony connections to governments, according to Oxfam. In specific contexts like the UK, 37% of billionaire wealth is linked directly to cronyism, with an additional 15% from monopolies.

Key Findings on State-Linked Wealth
Cronyism & Monopoly (Global): A significant portion of extreme wealth is not "self-made" but rather generated through state connections, regulatory capture, and monopolistic practices.

UK Context: In the UK, combined, cronyism and monopoly account for over half of billionaire wealth, according to the Equality Trust.

Economic Impact: This wealth is often described as "extractive," adding little value to society while relying on government connections or privatized public assets.

"Self-Made" vs. State-Enabled Wealth
While 67% of global billionaires are technically classified as "self-made," this often includes fortunes built on state-enabled infrastructure, contracts, or favorable regulations. In countries like Russia and China, this, for example, has resulted in high percentages of billionaires connected to state-controlled industries." (AI)

And, being a billionaire, Ratcliffe is supported in his inaccuracy (being kind here) by Creepy Nigel F.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 09:55:00 Richard Carter
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 10:09:00 David Ainsworth
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 11:57:00 Steven Rose
         Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 13:08:00 David Ainsworth
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 13:43:00 John Hawkes
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...14/02/26 12:55:00 John Hawkes
   Reply14/02/26 13:18:00 Michael Ixer
      Re:Reply14/02/26 14:14:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 15:54:00 Jonathan Callaway
            Re:Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 16:07:00 Sue Hammond
            Re:Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 16:42:00 David Ainsworth
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply15/02/26 12:43:00 John Hawkes
         Reply14/02/26 17:26:00 Michael Ixer
            Re:Reply14/02/26 17:37:00 Gerry Boyce
               Reply14/02/26 17:40:00 Michael Ixer
                  Re:Reply14/02/26 17:46:00 David Ainsworth
                     Reply14/02/26 18:07:00 Michael Ixer
                  Re:Reply14/02/26 18:14:00 Gerry Boyce
                     Re:Re:Reply14/02/26 18:39:00 Gerry Boyce
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply15/02/26 18:31:00 Gerry Boyce
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer..."But not totally wrong in what he claims18/02/26 15:53:00 John Hawkes
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer..."But is wrong in what he claims19/02/26 12:10:00 Philippa Bond
         Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer..."But is wrong in what he claims20/02/26 17:12:00 John Hawkes
   Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 14:09:00 John Hawkes
      Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 15:24:00 Michael Brigo
         Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 15:50:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 16:18:00 Michael Brigo
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 16:52:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 17:34:00 Philippa Bond
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong25/02/26 15:39:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong24/02/26 17:54:00 Michael Brigo
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Jim Rat really is a charmer...but not necessarily wrong25/02/26 15:41:00 John Hawkes

Forum Home