The appeal is final. As mentioned by Councillor McDonnell the developers need to present a fresh application that would address the points objected to by the Inspectorate and by the Council. The problem Catherine is that so long as the developers want to go ever higher and that WBC's planning department still think that East Putney requires a landmark building - as stated in their future planning policy documents - it is clear that each and every developer will aim to secure that "landmark building".   The only hope we have of getting sympathetic and appropriate proposals in the area rest with Edward Lister's pre election pledge at the local hustings that existing buildings should be replaced by buildings of " similar heights" - which is precisely what residents have been asking for all along - and also rest with the Conservative green paper on Planning which appears ( at first glance)to provide local residents with greater powers and involvement in the planning process. Both are still to be tested.

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Tileman House Appeal	01/06/10 16:37:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Tileman House Appeal	01/06/10 21:02:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Tileman House Appeal	01/06/10 21:15:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Tileman House Appeal	01/06/10 22:13:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Tileman House Appeal	01/06/10 22:35:00	Jim Maddan
Re:Re:Tileman House Appeal	01/06/10 22:49:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Tileman House Appeal	03/06/10 15:50:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Tileman House Appeal	04/06/10 08:18:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Tileman House Appeal	04/06/10 08:48:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:Tileman House Appeal	04/06/10 10:53:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Tileman House Appeal	05/06/10 14:25:00	Jonathan Callaway

Forum Home