I'm sure that I'll get shouted down but whilst many Forum members are always keen on planning applications being turned down, I would point out that Capsticks vacates on the first weekend in May. After that, I wonder how Caffe Nero, the dry cleaners, chemists etc etc in that part of URR will feel with the loss of c250 buyers of their goods and services. There will be no new tenants - the property is not fit for this century. I for one think that it is a great shame that that area will now be even more empty. Capsticks is moving to Wimbledon as there is property there big enough to accommodate them, there is none in Putney. I never see the usual planning complainers who also seem to bemoan the lack of variety on the High Street think about the consequence for the local economy of small or indeed, currently non-existent developments

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Putney Place	12/04/10 20:13:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Putney Place	12/04/10 20:37:00	Patricia Poulter
Putney Place	13/04/10 20:52:00	Isabel Wooller
Re:Putney Place	13/04/10 22:59:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Putney Place	15/04/10 12:31:00	Peter Savage
Putney Place	15/04/10 14:59:00	Isabel Wooller
Re:Putney Place	15/04/10 18:59:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Putney Place	15/04/10 22:00:00	Guy Sunda
Re:Re:Re:Putney Place	15/04/10 23:25:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Putney Place	19/04/10 16:40:00	Guy Sunda
Re:Putney Place	16/04/10 16:28:00	Lucy Lynch
Capsticks vacating their premises	16/04/10 16:43:00	Isabel Wooller
Re:Capsticks vacating their premises	16/04/10 18:11:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Capsticks vacating their premises	16/04/10 18:18:00	Lucy Lynch
Re:Re:Putney Place	16/04/10 20:41:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Putney Place	17/04/10 05:26:00	Roland Gilmore
Capsticks	19/04/10 17:15:00	Isabel Wooller
Re:Capsticks	20/04/10 11:04:00	Peter Savage

Forum Home