Topic: | Putney Place | |
Posted by: | Isabel Wooller | |
Date/Time: | 15/04/10 14:59:00 |
Sadly, the whole edifice of planning consultation completely disenfranchises the public: no matter what its avowed aims, it's set up as a jargon-ridden closed shop for developers, planners and quangos. The local is political, though, and my guess is there are votes on these issues. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Putney Place | 12/04/10 20:13:00 | Patricia Poulter |
Re:Putney Place | 12/04/10 20:37:00 | Patricia Poulter |
Putney Place | 13/04/10 20:52:00 | Isabel Wooller |
Re:Putney Place | 13/04/10 22:59:00 | Patricia Poulter |
Re:Re:Putney Place | 15/04/10 12:31:00 | Peter Savage |
Putney Place | 15/04/10 14:59:00 | Isabel Wooller |
Re:Putney Place | 15/04/10 18:59:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Re:Re:Putney Place | 15/04/10 22:00:00 | Guy Sunda |
Re:Re:Re:Putney Place | 15/04/10 23:25:00 | Patricia Poulter |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Putney Place | 19/04/10 16:40:00 | Guy Sunda |
Re:Putney Place | 16/04/10 16:28:00 | Lucy Lynch |
Capsticks vacating their premises | 16/04/10 16:43:00 | Isabel Wooller |
Re:Capsticks vacating their premises | 16/04/10 18:11:00 | Patricia Poulter |
Re:Capsticks vacating their premises | 16/04/10 18:18:00 | Lucy Lynch |
Re:Re:Putney Place | 16/04/10 20:41:00 | Patricia Poulter |
Re:Re:Re:Putney Place | 17/04/10 05:26:00 | Roland Gilmore |
Capsticks | 19/04/10 17:15:00 | Isabel Wooller |
Re:Capsticks | 20/04/10 11:04:00 | Peter Savage |