Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?
Posted by: Jonathan Callaway
Date/Time: 06/09/26 17:23:00

Hello Sue, nice to hear from you.

Sorry if I’ve posted too many links. I’ll try to offer fewer.

Academics, it seems, favour longer paragraphs. The rest of us perhaps not so much.

As with so much, I think we will have to disagree on Prof Runciman.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Votes for 16 year olds?05/09/26 15:11:00 Janis Christine Humberstone
   Reply05/09/26 16:04:00 Martine Guy
      Re:Reply05/09/26 18:45:00 Steven Rose
         Re:Re:Reply05/09/26 20:29:00 Ivonne Holliday
      Re:Reply05/09/26 19:31:00 Lucille Grant
         Re:Re:Reply05/09/26 20:11:00 Jonathan Callaway
            Reply05/09/26 20:56:00 Sue Hammond
   Re:Votes for 16 year olds?05/09/26 20:59:00 Adam Tripp
      Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?05/09/26 22:13:00 Jonathan Callaway
         Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 18:43:00 Lucille Grant
   Re:Votes for 16 year olds?05/09/26 22:39:00 Michael Brigo
      Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 01:32:00 Steven Rose
         Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 10:05:00 Jonathan Callaway
            Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 16:23:00 Sue Hammond
               Reply06/09/26 17:10:00 Michael Ixer
               Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 17:23:00 Jonathan Callaway
      Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 08:49:00 Barbara Stevens
         Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 09:46:00 Adam Tripp
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds?06/09/26 11:03:00 Steven Rose

Forum Home