| Topic: | Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | |
| Posted by: | Sue Hammond | |
| Date/Time: | 06/09/26 16:23:00 |
| @JC 6/9/26 10.05 I didn’t use your link (you post too many🥱) but I read Runciman’s rubbish from his article published in 2021 in the Guardian:👇 https://share.google/E1mmggXwN4bELtAWE In my opinion he wasn’t being provocative, he was deadly serious! This is quite worrying from someone described as a ‘political scientist’🙄 (what is the science behind politics (?) > perhaps Mr Ixer could explain) and is presumably why Runciman drones on and on in his very long article. Jonathan as you are so concerned about paragraphs - I think his article could have benefited from a few, what do you think? PS less links would be welcome |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Votes for 16 year olds? | 05/09/26 15:11:00 | Janis Christine Humberstone |
| Reply | 05/09/26 16:04:00 | Martine Guy |
| Re:Reply | 05/09/26 18:45:00 | Steven Rose |
| Re:Re:Reply | 05/09/26 20:29:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
| Re:Reply | 05/09/26 19:31:00 | Lucille Grant |
| Re:Re:Reply | 05/09/26 20:11:00 | Jonathan Callaway |
| Reply | 05/09/26 20:56:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 05/09/26 20:59:00 | Adam Tripp |
| Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 05/09/26 22:13:00 | Jonathan Callaway |
| Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 18:43:00 | Lucille Grant |
| Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 05/09/26 22:39:00 | Michael Brigo |
| Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 01:32:00 | Steven Rose |
| Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 10:05:00 | Jonathan Callaway |
| Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 16:23:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Reply | 06/09/26 17:10:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 17:23:00 | Jonathan Callaway |
| Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 08:49:00 | Barbara Stevens |
| Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 09:46:00 | Adam Tripp |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Votes for 16 year olds? | 06/09/26 11:03:00 | Steven Rose |