Forum Message

Topic: Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner
Posted by: Richard Carter
Date/Time: 16/04/24 10:27:00

I'm not a particular fan of Angela Rayner, but the snide attacks on her, here and elsewhere are really unpleasant. There's a very good letter in today's Times about her that I fully agree with. He says:

Sir, Having served for nine years as an MP I know how low politicians can stoop when their backs are against the wall. But the Conservative attack on Angela Rayner is one of the most grotesque spectacles of hypocrisy I have witnessed. On one side is a billionaire Tory peer, Lord Ashcroft, and a multimillionaire Tory prime minister, Rishi Sunak, whose families have all avoided paying millions of pounds in UK tax as beneficiaries of non-dom status and who live lives of luxury. On the other is a woman who grew up in poverty caring for her illiterate mother, who is now mother to a child who is registered blind, and who through her own guts and character has risen to be deputy leader of the Labour Party. Even Rayner’s accusers accept that the most she might have benefited from the error that they allege ­— and which she denies — is less than £3,000 in tax.

I suppose that her attackers cannot bear the idea that they are about to lose to a woman who pulled herself up by her bootstraps. And who is going wipe the floor with them.
Nick Boles
London SE5


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Dodgy dealings of Rayner03/03/24 09:57:00 Andy Pike
   Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 17:51:00 Robert Wheeler
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 18:44:00 John Geoffries
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner08/03/24 12:18:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner09/03/24 12:19:00 Philippa Bond
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 22:17:00 Michael Brigo
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 22:35:00 Robert Wheeler
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner05/03/24 00:05:00 Michael Brigo
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner05/03/24 09:36:00 Ivonne Holliday
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner05/03/24 20:39:00 Ed Robinson
   Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner08/03/24 12:21:00 John Hawkes
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner, it's not going away29/03/24 09:03:00 Andy Pike
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner29/03/24 09:11:00 Clifford Cowell
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner29/03/24 10:01:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner29/03/24 17:11:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner30/03/24 10:26:00 Sue Hammond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner12/04/24 22:21:00 Robert Wheeler
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner12/04/24 23:18:00 Andy Pike
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:33:00 John Hawkes
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 08:46:00 Alexander MacLeod
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 10:20:00 Lucille Grant
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:19:00 Steven Rose
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:52:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:10:00 Andy Pike
                     Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 19:17:00 Sue Hammond
   Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner16/04/24 10:27:00 Richard Carter
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner16/04/24 12:04:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner16/04/24 12:47:00 Andy Pike

Forum Home