Forum Message

Topic: Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner
Posted by: Sue Hammond
Date/Time: 13/04/24 19:17:00

Starmer and Rayner are both guilty of hypocrisy Andy although they present in  vastly different ways. Starmer attempts to belittle with his usual superior intellect approach whereas Rayner resorts to her sarcastic angry fishwife persona.

Now the Party have another situation being investigated by the police.

Labour got away with 'beergate' because it was investigated by Durham police. Joy Allen was the County Durham and Darlington Police and Crime Commissioner at the time.

Keir Starmer had previously campaigned for the crime tsar and had even recorded a video endorsing Labour's Joy Allen as she ran for election as Durham's police and crime commissioner.

Subsequently after their investigation Durham Police decided that Starmer, Rayner (and 15 other Labour colleagues) had not broken Covid rules.

Now Birmingham police are investigating whether (or not) Rayner has broken electoral law with her 2 homes shady shenanigans. Will this be another case of 'move along nothing to see here' response from the police? However I suppose that could depend on whether Starmer has any favours to redeem from that constabulary?






Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Dodgy dealings of Rayner03/03/24 09:57:00 Andy Pike
   Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 17:51:00 Robert Wheeler
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 18:44:00 John Geoffries
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner08/03/24 12:18:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner09/03/24 12:19:00 Philippa Bond
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 22:17:00 Michael Brigo
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner04/03/24 22:35:00 Robert Wheeler
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner05/03/24 00:05:00 Michael Brigo
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner05/03/24 09:36:00 Ivonne Holliday
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner05/03/24 20:39:00 Ed Robinson
   Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner08/03/24 12:21:00 John Hawkes
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner, it's not going away29/03/24 09:03:00 Andy Pike
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner29/03/24 09:11:00 Clifford Cowell
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner29/03/24 10:01:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner29/03/24 17:11:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner30/03/24 10:26:00 Sue Hammond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner12/04/24 22:21:00 Robert Wheeler
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner12/04/24 23:18:00 Andy Pike
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:33:00 John Hawkes
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 08:46:00 Alexander MacLeod
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 10:20:00 Lucille Grant
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:19:00 Steven Rose
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:52:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 12:10:00 Andy Pike
                     Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner13/04/24 19:17:00 Sue Hammond
   Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner16/04/24 10:27:00 Richard Carter
      Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner16/04/24 12:04:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Re:Dodgy dealings of Rayner16/04/24 12:47:00 Andy Pike

Forum Home