In other words it's OK to buy a 4 pack from Threshers and drink on the Embankment but not OK to buy a pint in a plastic glass from DH and drink on the Embankment...that is until they get the requisite permission from the licencing sub-committee. On the basis that "There is no question that the council has banned drinking on the Embankment" why should it matter to Ms Brass & Co where the drink was purchased? Furthermore if public safety/nuisance etc is the issue then surely pints @ £3+ is more likely to encourage restraint than 8 cans from Threshers costing £7ish. In a nutshell: Why should DH even need to apply for this amendment to their licence?

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Duke's Head - UPDATE	06/08/07 14:48:00	Nick Cochran
Re:Duke's Head - UPDATE	06/08/07 15:17:00	Simon Knight
Re:Duke's Head - UPDATE	24/09/07 20:01:00	Jonathan Callaway
Re:Re:Duke's Head - UPDATE	25/09/07 12:15:00	Sian Ryan
Re:Re:Re:Duke's Head - UPDATE	27/09/07 16:09:00	Nick Cochran
Re:Duke's Head - UPDATE	27/09/07 16:42:00	Bob Bowmer
Re:Re:Duke's Head - UPDATE	29/09/07 00:03:00	Vic Condon
Duke's Head - Rip-Off -  £4 a pint!	30/09/07 17:04:00	Darren B. Hewett

Forum Home