| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | |
| Posted by: | Richard Carter | |
| Date/Time: | 20/04/25 13:13:00 |
| "£48m worth of reinforcement for cyclists and pedestrians traffic is a scandal and robbery." It would have been if that was the case, but it wasn't: the work to prepare the bridge for pedestrians and cyclists, as I pointed out, was £2.9 million; the remainder of the £48 million, £45 million, was to restore and keep the bridge safe, which would have been needed even if it hadn't been made ready for pedestrians etc. And the restoration of Albert Bridge cost £7.2 million (https://citydays.com/places/albert-bridge/), somewhat less than the £250 million (and counting) that would be needed for Hammersmith! |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Hammersmith Bridge | 18/04/25 09:10:00 | Barbara Stevens |
| Re:Hammersmith Bridge | 18/04/25 09:19:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge | 18/04/25 09:37:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
| Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge | 18/04/25 13:44:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Hammersmith Bridge | 18/04/25 09:35:00 | Andy Pike |
| Reply | 18/04/25 15:10:00 | Richard Carter |
| Reply | 19/04/25 13:27:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
| Re:Reply | 19/04/25 14:52:00 | Philippa Bond |
| Re:Re:Reply | 19/04/25 16:54:00 | Ed Robinson |
| Re:Reply | 19/04/25 21:34:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Re:Reply | 19/04/25 21:48:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
| Re:Re:Re:Reply | 20/04/25 08:39:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 20/04/25 10:41:00 | Ed Robinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 20/04/25 12:05:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 20/04/25 13:13:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 20/04/25 14:46:00 | Ivonne Holliday |