| Topic: | Hawkes' Law? | |
| Posted by: | Richard Carter | |
| Date/Time: | 19/12/24 15:56:00 |
| "Yet the IDF not cited ?!" - in a discussion of possible corruption involving a British Member of Parluament. It looks, then, as if we need what you might call an adjunct to Godwin's Law - which, if I can remind you , says "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1." So I propose a further law, as follows: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Israel or Palestine, however itrelevant, approaches 1." And we could call it Hawkes' Law. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Anti Corruption Chief under investigation | 19/12/24 08:01:00 | Andy Pike |
| Re:Anti Corruption Chief under investigation | 19/12/24 10:11:00 | David Ainsworth |
| St Helier Hospital | 19/12/24 10:25:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Re:Re:Anti Corruption Chief under investigation | 19/12/24 10:46:00 | Andy Pike |
| Re:Re:Anti Corruption Chief under investigation | 19/12/24 13:32:00 | John Hawkes |
| Hawkes' Law? | 19/12/24 15:56:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Hawkes' Law? | 19/12/24 17:22:00 | John Hawkes |
| Re:Re:Hawkes' Law? | 19/12/24 20:36:00 | Richard Carter |
| Re:Re:Re:Hawkes' Law? | 19/12/24 22:19:00 | John Hawkes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Hawkes' Law? | 21/12/24 11:51:00 | John Hawkes |
| Re:Anti Corruption Chief under investigation | 19/12/24 10:30:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Reply | 19/12/24 12:20:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 19/12/24 13:36:00 | John Hawkes |
| Reply | 19/12/24 15:36:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 19/12/24 15:50:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Re:Re:Reply | 19/12/24 17:03:00 | John Hawkes |
| Reply | 19/12/24 17:18:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 23/12/24 11:25:00 | Ed Robinson |