| Topic: | Re:Reply | |
| Posted by: | John Hawkes | |
| Date/Time: | 11/05/26 16:19:00 |
| Mr Ixer You claimed of yourself earlier that 'I took a proof by induction approach'. Now you say 'Not induction, Mr Hawkes. A false proof by contradiction because, as I've said many times before political options are multi dimensional, not binary :-)' Your use of terms that you obviously do not understand is not helping your case of trying to prove how cleverer you are than the rest of us. Have you dropped your bookmark in your copy of "Rhetoric for Dummies" ? |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Zach Polanski’s Lies | 11/05/26 12:04:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Re:Zach Polanski’s Lies | 11/05/26 12:17:00 | John Hawkes |
| Re:Re:Zach Polanski’s Lies | 11/05/26 12:33:00 | Sue Hammond |
| Reply | 11/05/26 12:46:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 11/05/26 14:00:00 | John Hawkes |
| Reply | 11/05/26 14:21:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 11/05/26 16:06:00 | Steven Rose |
| Re:Reply | 11/05/26 16:19:00 | John Hawkes |
| Reply | 11/05/26 18:14:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 11/05/26 16:20:00 | Ivonne Holliday |