Forum Message

Topic: Re:Reply
Posted by: John Hawkes
Date/Time: 11/05/26 14:00:00

Mr Ixer

'Why would I defend someone I haven't supported. More incorrect facts, Mr Hawkes!'

After your anti-Farage vituperation I assumed you would therefore have supported Polanski who himself and his views are Farage's antithesis.

Following your example I simply took a proof by induction approach which obviously lead to the wrong conclusion.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Zach Polanski’s Lies11/05/26 12:04:00 Sue Hammond
   Re:Zach Polanski’s Lies11/05/26 12:17:00 John Hawkes
      Re:Re:Zach Polanski’s Lies11/05/26 12:33:00 Sue Hammond
      Reply11/05/26 12:46:00 Michael Ixer
         Re:Reply11/05/26 14:00:00 John Hawkes
            Reply11/05/26 14:21:00 Michael Ixer
               Re:Reply11/05/26 16:06:00 Steven Rose
               Re:Reply11/05/26 16:19:00 John Hawkes
                  Reply11/05/26 18:14:00 Michael Ixer
               Re:Reply11/05/26 16:20:00 Ivonne Holliday

Forum Home