Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Developers 2 , residents 0
Posted by: Suzanne Taylor
Date/Time: 16/04/11 19:10:00

We are replacing tired 60s buildings and in my opinion we should be able to do so with buildings which meet WBC's own sustainability requirements.  This site appears to fall well short.  To say nothing of transport and other concerns. 

How hard can it be to regenerate an area? What I would like to see is development without the bulk/density e.g. drop the height and don't add the bulk onto other bits of the site.  We all leave happy.  Developers will always make money no matter how hard they protest.  Communities have long memories.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Cramming more people into Putney18/02/11 09:43:00 Suzanne Taylor
   Re:Cramming more people into Putney18/02/11 11:30:00 Victoria Diamond
      Cramming more people into Putney18/02/11 12:17:00 Isabel Wooller
         Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/02/11 09:46:00 Jerrett Myers
            Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/02/11 12:30:00 Madeleine Henderson
            Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/02/11 18:23:00 Patricia Poulter
      Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/02/11 16:51:00 Patricia Poulter
         Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/02/11 19:49:00 Bunny Payne
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/02/11 20:30:00 Patricia Poulter
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/02/11 21:24:00 John Horrocks
                  Re:Cramming more people into Putney20/02/11 23:25:00 Lisa Smart
                     Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney21/02/11 10:09:00 Adam Bailey
                        Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney21/02/11 10:20:00 Patricia Poulter
                           Cramming more people into Putney21/02/11 12:03:00 Suzanne Taylor
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney21/02/11 13:11:00 Lucille Grant
                              Re::Cramming more people into Putney21/02/11 13:53:00 Patricia Poulter
                                 one more to add to your list21/02/11 17:38:00 James Matthews
                                    7th March 77-83 URR send your views01/03/11 11:55:00 Suzanne Taylor
                                       Re:7th March 77-83 URR 02/03/11 23:11:00 Patricia Poulter
                                          7th March 77-83 URR 03/03/11 09:58:00 Isabel Wooller
   Re:Cramming more people into Putney03/03/11 14:49:00 James Trueman
      Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney06/03/11 12:22:00 Patricia Poulter
         Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney15/04/11 20:55:00 Rufus Lyons
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney15/04/11 21:43:00 Suzanne Taylor
               Developers 2 , residents 016/04/11 13:47:00 Patricia Poulter
                  Re:Developers 2 , residents 016/04/11 15:55:00 James Matthews
                     Re:Re:Developers 2 , residents 016/04/11 17:43:00 Patricia Poulter
                        Re:Re:Re:Developers 2 , residents 016/04/11 19:10:00 Suzanne Taylor
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Developers 2 , residents 018/04/11 13:38:00 Rufus Lyons
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney19/04/11 11:16:00 Thomas de Wijn
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney20/04/11 07:51:00 Lucille Grant
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney20/04/11 08:12:00 Barbara Stevens
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney20/04/11 11:46:00 Suzanne Taylor
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney21/04/11 09:07:00 James Matthews
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney21/04/11 11:14:00 Thomas de Wijn
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cramming more people into Putney21/04/11 11:57:00 Sue Hammond

Forum Home