I'm a newcomer to this site having been directed here after inquiring about No 8 Lower Common South. The following is rather long but seeks to draw together various comments and the current situation as I see it. The owners of the property formerly known as 8 Lower Common South, Putney submitted their planning application on 17 December 2009 and this was approved by the Council on 19 March 2010. The planning permission was extensive but limited to the ‘Demolition of existing side extension. Erection of part single, part three-storey side/front extension; remodelling of front elevation; proposed extensions to roof including provision of terrace to front (nb arguably contrary to TBE2 (Townscale & Build Environment Rules set out in the Unitary Development Plan adopted by the Council in August 2003) but as the consent was granted it is what it is); erection of ground and first floor rear extension and excavation to form basement with front and rear light wells.’ Unambiguous one might say and no matter your nationality it clearly does not cover the complete demolition of the house. The subjective quality of the house facade (as was) and whether it’s location in a Conservation Area are irrelevancies other than in the latter case making the destructive act more egregious. Sometime between 19 March 2010 and 20 May 2010 the extent of the planning permission was ignored and the building demolished. The Council served an Enforcement Notice on the owner under reference 2010/0342. It is not clear what this notice is seeking to achieve (the terms are not seemingly available on the Council’s website) but the case comes before the Planning Application Committee this Thursday (24 June at 7:30pm). A report to be presented to the Committee has been prepared by the case officer (Annie Fenton). Part of this report states: Although the scheme recently granted permission involved substantial demolitions at the rear this was not so great as to require conservation area consent. The whole property has been demolished without consent which exceeds the consented demolition and excavation of the basement which had already commenced. A Building Control Demolition Notice was served on the Council in April, under Building Regulations. This is not a matter that could be refused under those regulations. The site manager met with the Building Control officer on 26th April 2010 and told the officer that he had discussed the demolitions with a conservation officer and obtained the necessary planning consents for complete demolition. However, neither planning permission nor conservation area consent had been sought nor had notification been received by the Council that the works were urgently necessary in the interests of health and safety. The owner of the house was called to a meeting with the Head of Development Control, the Conservation and Design Officer and the Enforcement Officer in order to discuss the demolition. This followed a full photographic survey of the site by the Planning Enforcement Officer. At the meeting the owner suggested that the demolition had not been intended and came about due to the poor condition of the retained fabric of the building. The outcome of the meeting was to invite a planning application for the demolition and rebuild and to stop any works above ground level immediately. The owners of the site have been advised in writing that a criminal offence has been committed and that the Council may prosecute. POLICY: TBE 10 and TBE 11 (Conservation areas). COMMENT: The demolition of an unlisted building in a conservation area, without the consent of the local planning authority is a criminal offence. Dilapidation should not by itself justify demolition and it is regrettable that the demolition has gone ahead prematurely. Whilst the meeting recently held suggested the owner wants to move forward in a spirit of cooperation, the approach seems to conflict with the claims previously made to the Building Control Officer that there had been full discussion with conservation officers regarding complete demolition. Given that the building has been demolished, the planning permission granted for alterations and extensions cannot be implemented. However, the original materials have been preserved and stored for use in the rebuild and the owner intends to re-build the house in accordance with an application for a new house that would be in conformity with the drawings approved under the planning permission granted. In view of this, it is suggested that no action be taken regarding enforcement action at this stage and that enforcement issues be reviewed when the planning application for rebuilding the house is reported to this Committee. RECOMMENDATION: That the Committee receive this report as information and that the enforcement issues are reported to Committee with the expected application to rebuild the house. So in short the Council seem minded simply to allow the owner to submit a planning application for a new build based on the existing drawings. Practically it seems there is little else that can be done even although the Council might like to note the shortcomings in the report before their forthcoming meeting namely: (1) Planning approval did not authorise demolition at the rear of the property just a side extension; (2) The report does not state why a building demolition order was served on the Council in April (and does not reference it’s terms); (3) Does not explain whether the ‘Building Control Officer’ checked with ‘a conservation officer’ following the site meeting or asked for a copy of the ‘consents’ for complete demolition or simply accepted the site manager’s word on this. Is this Council policy on such matters and if so why? (4) To enquire more about the owner’s concern about the ‘poor retained fabric of the building’. If this was an issue (and it may well have been the case) then presumably this was detailed in the demolition order. Nevertheless it is worth noting that extensive work has been carried out on a number of the houses in the street, most recently at No5 where the builders there were able to carry out extensive similar work without demolishing the house). Perhaps for the benefit of the forthcoming meeting the relevant Building Control Officer and the referenced consulting engineers (ADS Associates) and architects (Sutters Partnership) employed by the owner will add their reports. (5) Is it correct to say that Conservation Consent was not required? TBE 10 (which the Enforcement Case Officer refers to) provides that development will not be permitted if it would harm the character, appearance or setting of a conservation area; or fail to respect the grain of the area while TBE 11 proves that development involving demolition in a conservation area will only be permitted if the structure to be demolished makes no positive contribution to the character or appearance of the area or is incapable of further useful life; and detailed proposals for the re-use of the site, including any replacement building or other structure, have been approved. These are not much help after the event but worth noting that when planning was being considered the Wandsworth (Conservation Area) Advisory Committee commented ‘remodelling is inappropriate and we would prefer to see the front elevation retained and refurbished.’ Their comments were sought as the property lies within one of the 45 designated conservation areas within Wandsworth. Good intentions from the conservation team but now redundant following the unapproved demolition although they will have input on the new build. They will have their work cut out making a new build look as if it has been in place since 1885. Councillor Torrington in her comments of 8/6 at 16:59 and 21:01 said ‘It is hoped that the owner will co-operate.  If matters do not proceed on this basis in a timely manner, then the Council has the powers to prosecute for demolition of a building in a conservation area without the necessary consent.  In any prosecution, the Council will be expected to have sought a remedy through the planning process in the first instance’ and ‘The owner now has to come up with convincing plans over which the Council is likely to place stringent conditions in order to control the materials and other aspects of the architectural features etc.  It he doesn't do this, he will be prosecuted and fined’. Some of the posts understandably pose the question ‘If someone breaks planning regulations shouldn’t they be punished as a matter of principle, and made to remove or stop whatever they have done?’ Not according to our planning laws where enforcement is discretionary and not mandatory. The objective of planning enforcement is generally not to punish those who break the regulations but to remedy any harm caused by unlawful actions. So what sanctions are open to the Council? The Council needs to be satisfied that the breach causes harm (the missing building and a large hole in the ground should satisfy the most cynical amongst us on this aspect). Where a breach has occurred normal practice is then for the Council to write to the person responsible and suggest a course of action to remedy the breach before undertaking formal enforcement action.  In effect this is what the Enforcement Case Officer and indeed Councillor Torrington appear to be recommending. As the house has been demolished it would seem the most practical solution to an unfortunate disregard of the planning laws but understandable when one notes that even if enforcement proceedings are taken further under planning legislation the current maximum  fine which may be imposed on the guilty party is the princely sum of £5,000 (assuming that the owner is intending to build his new house in a style satisfactory to the Planning Committee and in accordance with whatever conditions might then be applied to the new build). Not a huge penalty for the owner of a property purchased for £2.1m last July and which if done up in the style of no5 should be valued at circ £4.4m. Also comfortably covered by (i) the saving on finalising the basement excavations without any structure above to worry about, (ii) the lower per sq ft cost of carrying out a new build versus a renovation and (iii) possibly a saving on VAT (which as of tomorrow may in of itself make the wreckers ball a very profitable act). Doubles all round! So absent a change in the Planning Laws (or at least the penalties for breach) it seems there is not a great deal that can be done here other than ordering a new build in the style to which planning approval has already been granted. Hopefully this will provide the owner and his property team (architects, consulting engineers and builders) some comfort that not much can happen to them notwithstanding what has occurred. Something tells me they may already know all of this anyway. However they may be so troubled by what has occurred in a conservation area and the limited penalty that they face if the Council proceeds with any action that they are readying themselves to make a substantial contribution to both The Putney Society and the Conservators of Wimbledon & Putney Commons.

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	31/05/10 12:13:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	31/05/10 12:41:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	31/05/10 15:14:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	31/05/10 17:16:00	Alex Harvey
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	31/05/10 19:54:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	31/05/10 20:35:00	Roy Jones
8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 07:20:00	Catherine Schade
Re:8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 10:33:00	Bunny Payne
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 11:28:00	Catherine Schade
8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 17:20:00	Rosemary Torrington
Re:8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 17:43:00	Catherine Schade
Re:8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 17:46:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 18:55:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 20:10:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	01/06/10 22:31:00	Jim Maddan
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	02/06/10 09:59:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	02/06/10 12:53:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	02/06/10 15:09:00	Adam Tripp
8 Lower Common South	03/06/10 12:09:00	Rosemary Torrington
Re:8 Lower Common South	03/06/10 15:46:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	03/06/10 15:52:00	Francis Forman
Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	03/06/10 16:37:00	Catherine Schade
Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	03/06/10 19:57:00	Adrian Knowles
Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 10:44:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 11:18:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 11:31:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 11:52:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 12:12:00	Jane Holland
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 13:40:00	Dave Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 12:21:00	Barry Barker
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 12:35:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 16:13:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 16:25:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 16:49:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 17:17:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 17:42:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 17:44:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 17:54:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 18:32:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 18:42:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 18:59:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 18:58:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 19:32:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 19:45:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	04/06/10 22:01:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	05/06/10 11:36:00	Suzanne Taylor
:Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	06/06/10 11:55:00	Steffi Sutters
Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	06/06/10 14:08:00	Guy Sunda
Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	06/06/10 21:24:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	07/06/10 12:25:00	Francis Forman
Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	07/06/10 12:55:00	Guy Sunda
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	07/06/10 21:09:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	07/06/10 23:09:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 11:36:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 13:47:00	Guy Sunda
8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 16:59:00	Rosemary Torrington
Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 19:28:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 19:44:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 19:54:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 20:18:00	Suzanne Taylor
8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 21:01:00	Rosemary Torrington
Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 21:38:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 22:05:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 22:46:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 23:08:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	08/06/10 22:46:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	09/06/10 08:05:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	09/06/10 10:49:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	09/06/10 11:47:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	09/06/10 17:55:00	Jim Maddan
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	09/06/10 16:34:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	09/06/10 17:44:00	Guy Sunda
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	10/06/10 11:49:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	10/06/10 12:01:00	Paul Smith
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	10/06/10 12:21:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	10/06/10 16:39:00	John Gorst
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	10/06/10 17:21:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	11/06/10 20:16:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	11/06/10 20:44:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	11/06/10 21:08:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	11/06/10 21:30:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Goings on at 8 Lower Common South	12/06/10 09:16:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	12/06/10 01:35:00	Philip John Evison
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	12/06/10 11:16:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	14/06/10 14:02:00	Francis Forman
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/06/10 10:37:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/06/10 11:17:00	Adam Tripp
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/06/10 14:23:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	20/06/10 21:51:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	20/06/10 22:17:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	20/06/10 22:59:00	Martine Guy
8 Lower Common South  WBC report to Planning Committee	21/06/10 11:02:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:8 Lower Common South  WBC report to Planning Committee	21/06/10 12:51:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South  WBC report to Planning Committee	21/06/10 16:41:00	Lucille Grant
8 Lower Common South	21/06/10 17:28:00	Brian Rutherford
Re:8 Lower Common South	21/06/10 18:37:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	21/06/10 20:32:00	Brian Rutherford
Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	22/06/10 12:18:00	Francis Forman
Re:Re:Re:Re:8 Lower Common South	22/06/10 15:02:00	Steffi Sutters
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	23/06/10 11:46:00	Sarah Felstead
This unlawful demolition	23/06/10 15:09:00	John Horrocks
Re:This unlawful demolition	24/06/10 12:40:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:This unlawful demolition	24/06/10 20:43:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:This unlawful demolition	24/06/10 22:38:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:This unlawful demolition	25/06/10 07:51:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Re:This unlawful demolition	25/06/10 11:55:00	Guy Sunda
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:This unlawful demolition	25/06/10 19:59:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:This unlawful demolition	26/06/10 12:11:00	Kirsty Hackshall
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:This unlawful demolition	26/06/10 13:38:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:This unlawful demolition	26/06/10 17:19:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	27/06/10 18:26:00	Cliff Pope
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 10:17:00	Brian Rutherford
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 13:36:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 14:09:00	Alex Harvey
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 16:49:00	Catherine Schade
8	30/06/10 18:02:00	Cliff Pope
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 19:44:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 20:30:00	Brian Rutherford
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 20:48:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 20:53:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 21:22:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 21:39:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/06/10 21:31:00	Brian Rutherford
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: Lower Common South	30/06/10 19:03:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	09/07/10 10:25:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	14/07/10 18:32:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	25/07/10 17:18:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	25/07/10 18:16:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	25/07/10 19:11:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	25/07/10 20:03:00	Jonathan Callaway
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	29/07/10 22:45:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	30/07/10 10:09:00	Michael Casa
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	30/07/10 11:30:00	Francis Forman
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	30/07/10 13:47:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	03/08/10 12:55:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	03/08/10 13:11:00	Suzanne Taylor
Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	03/08/10 13:26:00	Isabel Wooller
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	03/08/10 14:49:00	Jane Cowley
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	03/08/10 15:18:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	03/08/10 19:37:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	04/08/10 17:58:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 07:28:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 10:29:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 10:55:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 17:26:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 18:19:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 18:16:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 19:37:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 19:53:00	Adam Tripp
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 20:08:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/08/10 20:10:00	Jonathan Callaway
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	06/08/10 14:49:00	Catherine Schade
Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	06/08/10 17:20:00	Isabel Wooller
Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	06/08/10 17:54:00	Suzanne Taylor
Council's papers on 8 LCS going to Committee next week.n	12/08/10 13:07:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Council's papers on 8 LCS going to Committee next week.n	14/08/10 09:51:00	Patricia Poulter
Council report on 8 LCS	14/08/10 12:46:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Council report on 8 LCS	16/08/10 21:01:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	23/08/10 11:27:00	Alex Harvey
Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	23/08/10 20:09:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	25/08/10 15:59:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	25/08/10 18:54:00	Sian Evans
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	25/08/10 21:13:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	25/08/10 21:28:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	31/08/10 18:15:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	25/08/10 22:21:00	Sandi Bloomfield
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	25/08/10 21:16:00	Patricia Poulter
Council report on 8 LCS	25/08/10 21:58:00	Isabel Wooller
Re:Council report on 8 LCS	31/08/10 16:44:00	Madeleine Henderson
Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	31/08/10 18:21:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	31/08/10 23:02:00	Cliff Pope
Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	01/09/10 06:55:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	01/09/10 07:34:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	01/09/10 13:22:00	Madeleine Henderson
Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	01/09/10 08:32:00	Jim Maddan
Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	01/09/10 12:45:00	Stephen Dooley
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	01/09/10 19:00:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 09:34:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 09:57:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 13:20:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 14:39:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 15:25:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 17:58:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 18:23:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 18:57:00	Madeleine Henderson
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 19:02:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 21:07:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	04/09/10 23:22:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	05/09/10 12:56:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	05/09/10 13:17:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Council report on 8 LCS	06/09/10 07:36:00	Roland Gilmore
Merits of a council prosecution and rebuild	06/09/10 10:34:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Merits of a council prosecution and rebuild	06/09/10 17:06:00	Guy Sunda
Re:Re:Merits of a council prosecution and rebuild	12/09/10 20:47:00	Madeleine Henderson
The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	16/09/10 10:59:00	John Horrocks
Re:The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	16/09/10 16:25:00	Dale Ingram
Re:The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	16/09/10 20:02:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	16/09/10 21:55:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	18/09/10 13:32:00	Jean Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	18/09/10 15:06:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	18/09/10 17:44:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The current planning application on 8 Lower Common South	18/09/10 18:10:00	Suzanne Taylor
Prosecution over the 8 Lower Common South demolition? The Council has decided to do ... NOTHING	04/03/11 23:08:00	Richard Carter
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	28/09/10 17:31:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	29/09/10 09:28:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	29/09/10 13:31:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	13/10/10 12:14:00	Cliff Pope
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	13/10/10 09:41:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	13/10/10 11:08:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	15/10/10 11:56:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	15/10/10 13:49:00	Jim Maddan
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	15/10/10 16:13:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	16/10/10 09:50:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	16/10/10 12:55:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/10/10 11:24:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/10/10 12:18:00	Lucille Grant
Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/10/10 19:33:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/10/10 20:59:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	18/10/10 10:22:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	26/10/10 13:50:00	John Horrocks
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	22/10/10 13:02:00	Godfrey Shocket
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	26/10/10 20:00:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	26/10/10 20:49:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	16/11/10 09:29:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	16/11/10 20:06:00	Alex Harvey
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/11/10 12:13:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	17/11/10 13:24:00	Lucille Grant
Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	21/11/10 19:03:00	Suzanne Taylor
Shilly-shallying at the town hall?	25/11/10 11:23:00	John Horrocks
Re:Shilly-shallying at the town hall?	25/11/10 14:07:00	Suzanne Taylor
8 Lower Common South An Answer?	02/12/10 20:08:00	Madeleine Henderson
Re:8 Lower Common South An Answer?	03/12/10 10:27:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:8 Lower Common South An Answer?	15/12/10 10:00:00	Dale Ingram
WBC enforcement  or not........	20/12/10 22:19:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	29/12/10 13:15:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	29/12/10 18:06:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	30/12/10 17:35:00	Jonathan Callaway
Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	30/12/10 19:15:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	31/12/10 10:41:00	Jonathan Callaway
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	08/01/11 02:35:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	09/01/11 18:33:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	15/01/11 20:25:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	19/01/11 11:32:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	19/01/11 15:05:00	Roland Gilmore
WBC enforcement  or not........	04/02/11 19:25:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	04/02/11 19:46:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	04/02/11 21:09:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	05/02/11 13:40:00	Catherine Schade
Re:Re:Re:WBC enforcement  or not........	05/02/11 17:46:00	Matt Palmer
Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	05/02/11 19:47:00	John Horrocks
WBC decision, at last!	05/02/11 21:00:00	Madeleine Henderson
Re: WBC decision, at last!	05/02/11 21:29:00	John Chambers
Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	05/02/11 21:39:00	Madeleine Henderson
Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	05/02/11 23:08:00	Jason Lynham
Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	05/02/11 23:49:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 10:42:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 10:56:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 12:41:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 10:57:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 12:08:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 13:08:00	Alex Harvey
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 17:40:00	Cliff Pope
WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 18:45:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 19:49:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 19:58:00	Alex Harvey
Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 20:12:00	Leslie McDonnell
Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	06/02/11 20:21:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	07/02/11 13:12:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	07/02/11 16:05:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	07/02/11 16:10:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: WBC decision, at last!	07/02/11 16:30:00	Roland Gilmore
WBC decision, at last!	07/02/11 16:47:00	Madeleine Henderson
Re: The right decision, at last!	07/02/11 23:58:00	Roland Gilmore
Full and frank disclosure	08/02/11 13:38:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re: Full and frank disclosure	08/02/11 15:43:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re: Full and frank disclosure - at Thursday's meeting?	08/02/11 16:54:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re: Full and frank disclosure - at Thursday's meeting?	08/02/11 18:25:00	Alex Harvey
The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	09/02/11 11:51:00	Dale Ingram
Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	09/02/11 13:17:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 15:06:00	Roland Gilmore
:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 15:18:00	Brian Rutherford
Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 15:24:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 15:45:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 17:55:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 17:56:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 19:22:00	Brian Rutherford
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	10/02/11 18:02:00	Dale Ingram
Still curious........?	11/02/11 10:51:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	11/02/11 21:43:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	12/02/11 07:49:00	Lucille Grant
The Crown Prosecution Service and Public Interest Test	12/02/11 12:54:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:The Correct Judgement	14/02/11 21:26:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:The Correct Judgement	14/02/11 21:58:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:The Correct Judgement	15/02/11 08:59:00	Caroline Whitehead
Re:Re:Re:Re:The Correct Judgement	16/02/11 21:54:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Correct Judgement	17/02/11 11:29:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Correct Judgement	17/02/11 16:07:00	Cliff Pope
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Correct Judgement	17/02/11 16:37:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Correct Judgement	17/02/11 17:43:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:  The Committee's Minutes	17/02/11 17:50:00	John Horrocks
Is 298 responses a record...299 including mine.	17/02/11 17:54:00	Simon Knight
Re:Is 298 responses a record...299 including mine.	17/02/11 18:22:00	Lucille Grant
300 and not out - lets have an answer	17/02/11 18:24:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:300 and not out - lets have an answer	17/02/11 18:31:00	Simon Knight
503 is the record	17/02/11 20:32:00	Jonathan Callaway
Re:503 is the record	18/02/11 20:21:00	Simon Knight
Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/03/11 10:59:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/03/11 11:39:00	Richard Carter
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/03/11 11:40:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Just curious: 8 Lower Common South	05/03/11 11:45:00	Suzanne Taylor
But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	05/03/11 12:44:00	John Horrocks
Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	05/04/11 14:49:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	05/04/11 15:23:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	05/04/11 16:14:00	Victoria Diamond
Re:Re:Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	05/04/11 19:16:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	05/04/11 22:08:00	Martine Guy
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	06/04/11 09:49:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	06/04/11 10:12:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:But the unresolved issues have not gone away!	06/04/11 13:50:00	Lucille Grant
The way it is	07/04/11 07:07:00	Sarah Roberts
'Built in 2011'	10/04/11 10:10:00	John Horrocks
Re:'Built in 2011'	10/04/11 11:13:00	Richard Carter
Built in 2011'	10/04/11 11:55:00	Brian Rutherford
Re: Who's heritage champion?	21/04/11 20:36:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	22/04/11 11:13:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	22/04/11 12:49:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	22/04/11 18:19:00	Cliff Pope
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	23/04/11 09:20:00	Adam Tripp
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	23/06/11 09:37:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	31/07/11 17:22:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	31/07/11 18:01:00	Richard Carter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	31/07/11 18:15:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	31/07/11 21:44:00	Rufus Lyons
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Who's heritage champion?	31/07/11 22:10:00	Sue Hammond
A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	23/08/11 12:18:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	24/08/11 12:01:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	27/08/11 11:37:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	30/08/11 21:34:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	31/08/11 04:33:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	31/08/11 07:05:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	31/08/11 08:48:00	Elizabeth Balsom
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	31/08/11 10:43:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	31/08/11 10:44:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	01/09/11 14:46:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	01/09/11 16:20:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	01/09/11 17:19:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	01/09/11 18:13:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	01/09/11 20:37:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 08:27:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 09:26:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 11:35:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 11:53:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 12:52:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 14:00:00	David P Derby
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 15:42:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 15:51:00	David P Derby
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 16:17:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 16:33:00	David P Derby
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 17:38:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 21:17:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	05/09/11 10:39:00	Sue Hammond
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 13:31:00	John Horrocks
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 14:20:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 14:33:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 16:09:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 16:34:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	06/09/11 06:21:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 17:44:00	Lucille Grant
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	02/09/11 16:31:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	04/09/11 08:54:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	04/09/11 08:58:00	Patricia Poulter
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	04/09/11 11:33:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	04/09/11 20:39:00	Roland Gilmore
Nothing can alter the fact that 8 LCS is a 'Replica'	05/09/11 10:09:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Nothing can alter the fact that 8 LCS is a 'Replica'	05/09/11 11:09:00	Adam Tripp
Re:Re:Nothing can alter the fact that 8 LCS is a 'Replica'	05/09/11 21:17:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Nothing can alter the fact that 8 LCS is a 'Replica'	05/09/11 22:28:00	David P Derby
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	05/09/11 21:06:00	Dale Ingram
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	06/09/11 06:44:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	06/09/11 06:46:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	06/09/11 09:47:00	Sarah Roberts
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	06/09/11 15:11:00	Roland Gilmore
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	06/09/11 16:16:00	Suzanne Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	12/09/11 07:31:00	Sarah Roberts
A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	12/09/11 09:28:00	Dale Ingram
Re:A huge Wandsworth Cover Up?	13/09/11 07:43:00	Lucille Grant
New front boundary wall for Putney Lower Common	31/10/11 18:15:00	John Horrocks
Criminal record for builder/unauthorised demolition in Conservation area	10/01/12 05:08:00	Dale Ingram
Sorry to bring this up again, I just want to know what S and I need to get beat the record	29/03/12 21:11:00	John Cameron
Re:Sorry to bring this up again, I just want to know what S and I need to get beat the record	30/03/12 03:09:00	Catherine Schade

Forum Home