| Topic: | Reply | |
| Posted by: | Michael Ixer | |
| Date/Time: | 05/02/26 21:57:00 |
Mmm. Of course, no one on this forum sat through the trial, perhaps the prosecution barrister was crap and the defence one very persuasive? The charges where there was no agreement will surely go to a retrial if the DPP thinks there's a strong case? The jury system; well that's democracy ... |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Trial by jury acting in accordance with their conscience | 05/02/26 20:32:00 | Steven Rose |
| Reply | 05/02/26 21:07:00 | Michael Brigo |
| Re:Reply | 05/02/26 21:47:00 | Ivonne Holliday |
| Re:Re:Reply | 05/02/26 23:18:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Reply | 06/02/26 01:41:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 06/02/26 10:25:00 | Andy Pike |
| Re:Re:Reply | 06/02/26 11:03:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Re:Trial by jury acting in accordance with their conscience | 05/02/26 21:24:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Re:Re:Trial by jury acting in accordance with their conscience | 05/02/26 21:30:00 | David Ainsworth |
| Reply | 05/02/26 21:57:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Trial by jury acting in accordance with their conscience | 06/02/26 12:00:00 | John Hawkes |
| Re:Re:Trial by jury acting in accordance with their conscience | 06/02/26 23:14:00 | Steven Rose |
| Re:Re:Re:Trial by jury acting in accordance with their conscience | 07/02/26 12:59:00 | John Hawkes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Trial by jury acting in accordance with their conscience | 07/02/26 14:11:00 | Lucille Grant |