Forum Message

Topic: Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.
Posted by: David Beeney
Date/Time: 18/06/25 11:22:00

We should not discount the fact that Saddam Hussein did indeed have weapons of mass destruction.  The UN definition of weapons of mass destruction includes chemical and biological weapons.  Saddam Hussein had a record or using chemical weapons, including during the Iran / Iraq war and against the Kurdish civilian population in Iraq.  None were found after the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq.  But that could well be because up until the eleventh hour, Saddam Hussein had obstructed the work of UN weapons inspectors - in contravention to the terms of the ceasefire at the end of the 1991 Gulf War - which may have bought him time to conceal the evidence.  So the alliance of far left / Corbynite activists and Tories, both of whom have a vested interest in discrediting past Labour Governments, are perhaps somewhat naive in their calls for Tony Blair to stand trial in front of the International Criminal Court on count of a so-called illegal war, whilst at the same time, it seems, forgetting the barbarity of Saddam Hussein and his regime.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.17/06/25 12:48:00 David Ainsworth
   Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.17/06/25 14:02:00 John Hawkes
   Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.17/06/25 14:07:00 John Hawkes
   Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 11:22:00 David Beeney
      Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 12:37:00 Michael Brigo
         Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 13:28:00 Adam Tripp
            Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 14:03:00 David Ainsworth
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 14:29:00 Adam Tripp
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 15:28:00 David Ainsworth
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.19/06/25 12:02:00 John Hawkes
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 14:34:00 John Hawkes
         Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 14:37:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.18/06/25 15:19:00 Michael Brigo
               Reply18/06/25 15:54:00 Sue Hammond
                  Re:Reply18/06/25 17:04:00 Richard Carter
                     Re:Re:Reply18/06/25 17:23:00 Sue Hammond
                     Re:Re:Reply18/06/25 18:59:00 Ivonne Holliday
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply19/06/25 12:11:00 John Hawkes
                  Re:Reply18/06/25 17:05:00 David Ainsworth
                     Re:Re:Reply18/06/25 17:24:00 Sue Hammond
                        Never happen18/06/25 17:37:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Never happen18/06/25 18:56:00 Ed Robinson
                           Reply18/06/25 20:50:00 Sue Hammond
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply18/06/25 21:02:00 Jane Carter
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply19/06/25 14:47:00 Sue Hammond
                     Re:Re:Reply19/06/25 12:16:00 John Hawkes
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply19/06/25 12:41:00 David Ainsworth
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply19/06/25 13:12:00 John Hawkes
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply19/06/25 13:31:00 David Ainsworth
         Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.19/06/25 11:43:00 David Beeney
            Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.19/06/25 14:23:00 David Ainsworth
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.19/06/25 15:00:00 John Hawkes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.19/06/25 14:57:00 Lucille Grant
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.25/06/25 15:46:00 David Beeney
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.25/06/25 17:26:00 Andy Pike
            Re:Re:Re:Re:It's 2003 all over again, 45 minutes.25/06/25 21:09:00 Michael Brigo

Forum Home