| Topic: | Reply | |
| Posted by: | Michael Ixer | |
| Date/Time: | 11/04/24 09:49:00 |
The fraudster technically isn't Meta/Facebook, it's whoever is posting the fraudulent adverts. If Meta/Facebook can demonstrate they are removing a significant proportion of these adverts then there probably is no case against them. One could argue the problem is Facebook's business model but I doubt one could construct a legal case around that. The problem is, firstly, taking libel action is risky and expensive and, secondly, Meta has significant resources to fund lawyers. The consequences of losing would be financially crippling. I suspect Mr Lewis is taking a pragmatic approach to this? Let's face it, even powerful government agencies in tge US and EU have difficulties taming big tech companies. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert Founder. | 10/04/24 13:36:00 | Neil Milkins |
| Re:Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert Founder. | 10/04/24 17:53:00 | Andy Pike |
| Re:Re:Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert Founder. | 10/04/24 21:01:00 | Neil Milkins |
| Re:Re:Re:Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert Founder. | 10/04/24 22:35:00 | Andy Pike |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert Founder. | 11/04/24 09:29:00 | Neil Milkins |
| Reply | 11/04/24 09:49:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert Founder. | 11/04/24 09:57:00 | Andy Pike |
| Reply | 10/04/24 20:11:00 | Michael Ixer |
| Re:Reply | 10/04/24 21:06:00 | Neil Milkins |
| Re:Re:Reply | 11/04/24 10:16:00 | Andy Pike |
| Re:Re:Re:Reply | 11/04/24 17:02:00 | Neil Milkins |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 11/04/24 21:02:00 | Andy Pike |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 11/04/24 22:48:00 | Neil Milkins |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 12/04/24 14:38:00 | John Kettlekey |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 12/04/24 21:20:00 | Neil Milkins |